Evaluates the zero-shot generalization capability of instruction-tuned language models by retrieving and applying task-specific soft prompt embeddings at inference time to adapt to unseen tasks. Use when the user wants to benchmark on BIG-bench, SuperGLUE/HellaSwag/StoryCloze/WiC suite, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports accuracy.
Scanned 9/11/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add qhjqhj00/research-skills-pool --skill rospr-eval --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Rospr Eval?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/qhjqhj00-rospr-eval)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: rospr-eval
description: Evaluates the zero-shot generalization capability of instruction-tuned language models by retrieving and applying task-specific soft prompt embeddings at inference time to adapt to unseen tasks. Use when the user wants to benchmark on BIG-bench, SuperGLUE/HellaSwag/StoryCloze/WiC suite, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports accuracy.
metadata:
skill_kind: dataset_eval
source_arxiv: 2210.03029
bibtex_key: ye2022rospr
confidence: medium
---
# rospr-eval
> Efficiently Enhancing Zero-Shot Performance of Instruction Following Model via Retrieval of Soft Prompt — Ye et al. (2022) (arXiv:2210.03029, 2022)
## What this evaluates
Evaluates the zero-shot generalization capability of instruction-tuned language models by retrieving and applying task-specific soft prompt embeddings at inference time to adapt to unseen tasks.
## Datasets
- **BIG-bench** — total ?; splits: test (-1)
- **SuperGLUE/HellaSwag/StoryCloze/WiC suite** — total ?; splits: test (-1)
## Metrics
- `accuracy` **(primary)** — range: percent
- Percentage of correctly predicted answer choices or generated outputs matching the gold labels across all tasks.
## Input / output format
**Input**: Hard prompt template concatenated with the input instance, followed by a retrieved soft prompt embedding vector.
**Output**: Predicted answer choice or text generation corresponding to the hard prompt's expected output format.
## Scoring recipe
```python
correct = 0
total = 0
for pred, gold in zip(predictions, gold_labels):
if normalize(pred) == normalize(gold):
correct += 1
total += 1
return (correct / total) * 100
```
## Common pitfalls
- Retrieval is performed on a randomly sampled subset of target task instances (Q) rather than the full test set, which may introduce variance.
- Soft prompts are trained on source tasks and retrieved via dense embedding similarity, which may not perfectly align with target task semantics or answer choice formats.
## Evidence (verbatim from paper)
> improving performance on 10 out of 11 tasks and boosting BIG-bench mean accuracy by 2.39% with only 0.007% additional parameters.
## Citation
```bibtex
@misc{ye2022rospr,
title={Efficiently Enhancing Zero-Shot Performance of Instruction Following Model via Retrieval of Soft Prompt},
author={Ye et al. (2022)},
year={2022},
note={arXiv:2210.03029}
}
```
- arXiv: 2210.03029
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!