Evaluates a model's ability to retrieve relevant cross-file code snippets given an in-file context for predicting the next line of code. Use when the user wants to benchmark on RepoBench-R, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports acc@1.
Scanned 9/11/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add qhjqhj00/research-skills-pool --skill repobench-r-eval --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Repobench R Eval?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/qhjqhj00-repobench-r-eval)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: repobench-r-eval
description: Evaluates a model's ability to retrieve relevant cross-file code snippets given an in-file context for predicting the next line of code. Use when the user wants to benchmark on RepoBench-R, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports acc@1.
metadata:
skill_kind: dataset_eval
source_arxiv: 2306.03091
bibtex_key: liu2023repobench
confidence: high
---
# repobench-r-eval
> RepoBench: Benchmarking Repository-Level Code Auto-Completion Systems — Liu et al. (2023) (arXiv:2306.03091, 2023)
## What this evaluates
Evaluates a model's ability to retrieve relevant cross-file code snippets given an in-file context for predicting the next line of code.
## Datasets
- **RepoBench-R** — total ?; splits: test (-1)
## Metrics
- `acc@1` **(primary)** — range: [0, 1]
- Accuracy at top-1 retrieval. 1 if the gold snippet is ranked first, 0 otherwise.
- `acc@3` — range: [0, 1]
- Accuracy at top-3 retrieval.
- `acc@5` — range: [0, 1]
- Accuracy at top-5 retrieval.
## Input / output format
**Input**: Cropped in-file code (typically last 3 lines) and a pool of candidate code snippets from other files in the repository.
**Output**: Top-k ranked candidate code snippets.
## Scoring recipe
```python
def score(predictions, gold):
acc1 = 1.0 if gold in predictions[:1] else 0.0
acc3 = 1.0 if gold in predictions[:3] else 0.0
acc5 = 1.0 if gold in predictions[:5] else 0.0
return acc1, acc3, acc5
```
## Common pitfalls
- Random retrieval baseline requires averaging over 100 runs for stability.
- Cropping m=3 lines is standard but ablation studies show sensitivity to the number of kept lines.
## Evidence (verbatim from paper)
> Table 2 presents a detailed comparison of different retrieval strategies in RepoBench-R. | acc@1 | acc@3 | acc@5 |
## Citation
```bibtex
@misc{liu2023repobench,
title={RepoBench: Benchmarking Repository-Level Code Auto-Completion Systems},
author={Liu et al. (2023)},
year={2023},
note={arXiv:2306.03091}
}
```
- arXiv: 2306.03091
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!