Skip to content
Back to skills

Refcocom Eval

ASecurity

Evaluates a model's ability to perform referring expression segmentation at both object and part levels. It probes fine-grained cross-modal alignment and pixel-level semantic understanding by requiring precise mask prediction for diverse textual references. Use when the user wants to benchmark on RefCOCOm, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports mIoU.

  • 3 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 0 views
  • Added September 11, 2026
researchpythongoexpressgit

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned September 11, 2026

npx -y skills add qhjqhj00/research-skills-pool --skill refcocom-eval --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Refcocom Eval?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Refcocom Eval
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/qhjqhj00-refcocom-eval/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/qhjqhj00-refcocom-eval)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: refcocom-eval
description: Evaluates a model's ability to perform referring expression segmentation at both object and part levels. It probes fine-grained cross-modal alignment and pixel-level semantic understanding by requiring precise mask prediction for diverse textual references. Use when the user wants to benchmark on RefCOCOm, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports mIoU.
metadata:
  skill_kind: dataset_eval
  source_arxiv: 2504.01954
  bibtex_key: liu2025refcocom
  confidence: high
---

# refcocom-eval

> Towards Unified Referring Expression Segmentation Across Omni-Level Visual Target Granularities — Jing Liu et al. (2025) (arXiv:2504.01954, 2025)

## What this evaluates

Evaluates a model's ability to perform referring expression segmentation at both object and part levels. It probes fine-grained cross-modal alignment and pixel-level semantic understanding by requiring precise mask prediction for diverse textual references.

## Datasets

- **RefCOCOm** — total 92000; splits: validation (-1), testA (-1), testB (-1); repo https://github.com/Rubics-Xuan/MRES

## Metrics

- `mIoU` **(primary)** — range: [0, 1]
  - Mean Intersection-over-Union between predicted and ground-truth binary segmentation masks. Computed as the average of |pred ∩ gt| / |pred ∪ gt| across all references.

## Input / output format

**Input**: An image paired with a natural language referring expression.

**Output**: A binary segmentation mask corresponding to the referenced entity (object or part).

## Scoring recipe

```python
ious = []
for pred_mask, gt_mask in zip(predictions, ground_truths):
    intersection = np.logical_and(pred_mask, gt_mask).sum()
    union = np.logical_or(pred_mask, gt_mask).sum()
    if union > 0:
        ious.append(intersection / union)
return np.mean(ious)
```

## Common pitfalls

- Evaluating only on object-level masks ignores the benchmark's core part-level grounding contribution, leading to inflated but misleading scores.
- Models trained exclusively on object-level data often fail to generalize to part-level references without explicit multi-granularity fine-tuning or fine-grained feature exploration.
- Using bounding box metrics instead of pixel-level IoU misaligns with the segmentation task definition and underestimates localization precision.

## Evidence (verbatim from paper)

> To align with the goal of multi-granularity unification, we use mean Intersection-over-Union (mIoU) as the evaluation metric. Combined with the original object-level annotations, RefCOCOm includes 34k masks and 92k references overall.

## Citation

```bibtex
@misc{liu2025refcocom,
  title={Towards Unified Referring Expression Segmentation Across Omni-Level Visual Target Granularities},
  author={Jing Liu et al. (2025)},
  year={2025},
  note={arXiv:2504.01954}
}
```

- arXiv: 2504.01954

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.