Evaluates fine-grained visual grounding and spatial reasoning by measuring how accurately a multimodal model can localize regions in images corresponding to given referring expressions under varying linguistic and spatial conditions. Use when the user wants to benchmark on RefCOCO, RefCOCO+, RefCOCOg, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports IoU@50 accuracy.
Scanned 9/11/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add qhjqhj00/research-skills-pool --skill refcoco-grounding-eval --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Refcoco Grounding Eval?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/qhjqhj00-refcoco-grounding-eval)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: refcoco-grounding-eval
description: Evaluates fine-grained visual grounding and spatial reasoning by measuring how accurately a multimodal model can localize regions in images corresponding to given referring expressions under varying linguistic and spatial conditions. Use when the user wants to benchmark on RefCOCO, RefCOCO+, RefCOCOg, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports IoU@50 accuracy.
metadata:
skill_kind: dataset_eval
source_arxiv: 2512.12633
bibtex_key: tao2025dig
confidence: high
---
# refcoco-grounding-eval
> DiG: Differential Grounding for Enhancing Fine-Grained Perception in Multimodal Large Language Model — Tao et al. (2025) (arXiv:2512.12633, 2025)
## What this evaluates
Evaluates fine-grained visual grounding and spatial reasoning by measuring how accurately a multimodal model can localize regions in images corresponding to given referring expressions under varying linguistic and spatial conditions.
## Datasets
- **RefCOCO** — total ?; splits: val (-1), testA (-1), testB (-1)
- **RefCOCO+** — total ?; splits: val (-1), testA (-1), testB (-1)
- **RefCOCOg** — total ?; splits: val (-1), test (-1)
## Metrics
- `IoU@50 accuracy` **(primary)** — range: [0, 1]
- Percentage of correctly localized regions where the Intersection over Union (IoU) between the predicted bounding box and the ground truth box is ≥ 0.5.
- `valavg / testAavg / testBavg` — range: [0, 1]
- Average accuracy across IoU thresholds of 50, 75, and 95 for the validation, testA, or testB splits respectively.
## Input / output format
**Input**: An image and a referring expression (text query describing a target object/region).
**Output**: Bounding box coordinates (typically [x_min, y_min, x_max, y_max] normalized to [0, 1] or in pixel space).
## Scoring recipe
```python
def compute_iou(box1, box2):
x1 = max(box1[0], box2[0])
y1 = max(box1[1], box2[1])
x2 = min(box1[2], box2[2])
y2 = min(box1[3], box2[3])
inter = max(0, x2 - x1) * max(0, y2 - y1)
area1 = (box1[2] - box1[0]) * (box1[3] - box1[1])
area2 = (box2[2] - box2[0]) * (box2[3] - box2[1])
return inter / (area1 + area2 - inter)
def score(predictions, golds, threshold=0.5):
correct = sum(1 for pred, gold in zip(predictions, golds) if compute_iou(pred, gold) >= threshold)
return correct / len(golds)
```
## Common pitfalls
- RefCOCO has two distinct test sets (testA from Flickr30k, testB from COCO); results must be reported separately.
- IoU thresholds of 50, 75, and 95 are standard; reporting only one may misrepresent performance.
- Coordinate format (normalized vs. absolute pixels) must match the ground truth scale to avoid incorrect IoU calculations.
## Evidence (verbatim from paper)
> Results on referring expression comprehension datasets RefCOCO, RefCOCO+, and RefCOCOg. Incorporating DiG into Qwen3-VL models consistently improves localization accuracy across different IoU thresholds, demonstrating stronger fine-grained spatial grounding and generalization ability.
## Citation
```bibtex
@misc{tao2025dig,
title={DiG: Differential Grounding for Enhancing Fine-Grained Perception in Multimodal Large Language Model},
author={Tao et al. (2025)},
year={2025},
note={arXiv:2512.12633}
}
```
- arXiv: 2512.12633
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!