Skip to content
Back to skills

Redial Movie Recommendation Eval

ASecurity

Evaluates modular components of a conversational recommendation system, specifically cold-start movie rating prediction and movie opinion sentiment analysis (seen/liked status) from dialogue text. Use when the user wants to benchmark on REDIAL, MovieLens, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports RMSE.

  • 3 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 0 views
  • Added September 11, 2026
researchpython

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned September 11, 2026

npx -y skills add qhjqhj00/research-skills-pool --skill redial-movie-recommendation-eval --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Redial Movie Recommendation Eval?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Redial Movie Recommendation Eval
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/qhjqhj00-redial-movie-recommendation-eval/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/qhjqhj00-redial-movie-recommendation-eval)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: redial-movie-recommendation-eval
description: Evaluates modular components of a conversational recommendation system, specifically cold-start movie rating prediction and movie opinion sentiment analysis (seen/liked status) from dialogue text. Use when the user wants to benchmark on REDIAL, MovieLens, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports RMSE.
metadata:
  skill_kind: dataset_eval
  source_arxiv: 1812.07617
  bibtex_key: li2018towards
  confidence: high
---

# redial-movie-recommendation-eval

> Towards Deep Conversational Recommendations — Li et al. (2018) (arXiv:1812.07617, 2018)

## What this evaluates

Evaluates modular components of a conversational recommendation system, specifically cold-start movie rating prediction and movie opinion sentiment analysis (seen/liked status) from dialogue text.

## Datasets

- **REDIAL** — total 10000; splits: validation (-1), test (-1)
- **MovieLens** — total 26000000; splits: train (-1), validation (-1), test (-1)

## Metrics

- `Cohen's kappa` — range: [-1, 1]
  - Measures inter-rater agreement between true labels and predictions, correcting for chance. κ = (p_o - p_e) / (1 - p_e).
- `RMSE` **(primary)** — range: [0, 1] or [0, 5]
  - Root Mean Squared Error between predicted and actual ratings. RMSE = sqrt(mean((y_true - y_pred)^2)).

## Input / output format

**Input**: Sentiment: text spans between first and last mention of a movie in a dialogue turn. Recommendation: binary or scaled ratings from a conversation's history (treated as a user profile).

**Output**: Sentiment: binary classification labels (seen/not seen, liked/not liked). Recommendation: predicted rating value (0/1 or 0.5–5).

## Scoring recipe

```python
def compute_kappa(y_true, y_pred):
    return kappa_score(y_true, y_pred)

def compute_rmse(y_true, y_pred):
    return np.sqrt(np.mean((np.array(y_true) - np.array(y_pred)) ** 2))
```

## Common pitfalls

- Class imbalance in sentiment labels (81% liked) requires explicit loss weighting during training.
- Cold-start evaluation treats each conversation as an independent user, ignoring cross-conversation user history.
- MovieLens ratings must be binarized (threshold ≥2) to match REDIAL's distribution before pre-training.

## Evidence (verbatim from paper)

> We also provide Cohen's kappa coefficient [26] for each model and prediction task. Cohen's kappa measures the agreement between the true label and the predictions. ... Table 2 shows the RMSE obtained on the test set. ... Randomly chosen user-item ratings are held out for validation and test, and only training ratings are used as inputs. Following Sedhain et al. [1], we sampled the training, validation, and test set in a 80-10-10 proportion, and repeated this splitting procedure five times, reporting the average RMSE.

## Citation

```bibtex
@misc{li2018towards,
  title={Towards Deep Conversational Recommendations},
  author={Li et al. (2018)},
  year={2018},
  note={arXiv:1812.07617}
}
```

- arXiv: 1812.07617

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.