Skip to content
Back to skills

Realsi Sst Eval

ASecurity

Evaluates end-to-end simultaneous speech-to-speech translation quality and latency on long-form, multi-domain continuous speech. Probes the model's ability to maintain semantic accuracy, speaker voice characteristics, and low delay in real-time multilingual dialogue. Use when the user wants to benchmark on RealSI, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports VIP.

  • 3 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 0 views
  • Added September 11, 2026
researchpythonperformance

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned September 11, 2026

npx -y skills add qhjqhj00/research-skills-pool --skill realsi-sst-eval --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Realsi Sst Eval?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Realsi Sst Eval
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/qhjqhj00-realsi-sst-eval/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/qhjqhj00-realsi-sst-eval)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: realsi-sst-eval
description: Evaluates end-to-end simultaneous speech-to-speech translation quality and latency on long-form, multi-domain continuous speech. Probes the model's ability to maintain semantic accuracy, speaker voice characteristics, and low delay in real-time multilingual dialogue. Use when the user wants to benchmark on RealSI, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports VIP.
metadata:
  skill_kind: dataset_eval
  source_arxiv: 2507.17527
  bibtex_key: [REDACTED]
  confidence: high
---

# realsi-sst-eval

> Seed LiveInterpret 2.0: End-to-end Simultaneous Speech-to-speech Translation with Your Voice — Cheng et al. (2025) (arXiv:2507.17527, 2025)

## What this evaluates

Evaluates end-to-end simultaneous speech-to-speech translation quality and latency on long-form, multi-domain continuous speech. Probes the model's ability to maintain semantic accuracy, speaker voice characteristics, and low delay in real-time multilingual dialogue.

## Datasets

- **RealSI** — total ?; splits: test (-1)

## Metrics

- `VIP` **(primary)** — range: [0, 100] (score)
  - Human evaluation metric measuring the proportion of valid semantic fragments that accurately convey the speaker’s original intent, closely aligning with human interpreter judgments.
- `SVIP` — range: [0, 100] (score)
  - Speech-specific extension of VIP measuring the proportion of valid speech semantic fragments within a session, requiring core information accuracy, acceptable latency, appropriate pace, and acoustic clarity.
- `BLEURT` — range: [0, 100] or [-1, 1]
  - Automated neural metric for translation quality based on BERT representations.
- `COMET` — range: [0, 100] or [-1, 1]
  - Automated neural metric for translation quality using cross-lingual representations.
- `FLAL` — range: [0, ∞) seconds
  - First Letter Appearance Lagging: time until the system outputs the first determined translation at the paragraph level.
- `AL` — range: [0, ∞) seconds
  - Average Lagging: widely adopted sentence-level latency metric measuring average delay between source and target utterances.
- `LAAL` — range: [0, ∞) seconds
  - Length Adaptive Average Lagging: sentence-level latency metric normalized by output length.

## Input / output format

**Input**: Continuous audio speech in Chinese or English (approx. 5 minutes per sample for long-form; sentence-level for short-form).

**Output**: Translated audio speech in the target language (with voice cloning) or translated text, generated simultaneously as the source audio plays.

## Scoring recipe

```python
def calculate_vip_svip(transcript_segments):
    valid = 0
    total = len(transcript_segments)
    for seg in transcript_segments:
        if (conveys_core_intent(seg) and
            latency_acceptable(seg) and
            pace_acceptable(seg) and
            clarity_acceptable(seg)):
            valid += 1
    return (valid / total) * 100

def calculate_latency(source_timestamps, target_timestamps):
    al = mean(target_timestamps - source_timestamps)
    flal = target_timestamps[0] - source_timestamps[0]
    return al, flal
```

## Common pitfalls

- Automated metrics like BLEURT and COMET may not fully reflect true translation capabilities compared to human VIP/SVIP scores.
- Commercial baselines often employ post-hoc rewriting strategies, making direct latency/quality comparisons with human-like simultaneous interpreters misleading.
- Missing table entries indicate lack of feature support (e.g., speech-to-speech) rather than zero performance.

## Evidence (verbatim from paper)

> For text translation quality assessment, we primarily rely on the idea of the human evaluation metric, Valid Information Proportion (VIP) *[[6]]*, which measures how accurately the translation output conveys the speaker’s original intent for each semantic fragment, closely aligning with human interpreter judgments.

## Citation

```bibtex
@misc{cheng2025seedliveinterpret2,
  title={Seed LiveInterpret 2.0: End-to-end Simultaneous Speech-to-speech Translation with Your Voice},
  author={Cheng et al. (2025)},
  year={2025},
  note={arXiv:2507.17527}
}
```

- arXiv: 2507.17527

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.