Evaluates end-to-end simultaneous speech-to-speech translation quality and latency on long-form, multi-domain continuous speech. Probes the model's ability to maintain semantic accuracy, speaker voice characteristics, and low delay in real-time multilingual dialogue. Use when the user wants to benchmark on RealSI, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports VIP.
Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Realsi Sst Eval?
Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/qhjqhj00-realsi-sst-eval)
---
name: realsi-sst-eval
description: Evaluates end-to-end simultaneous speech-to-speech translation quality and latency on long-form, multi-domain continuous speech. Probes the model's ability to maintain semantic accuracy, speaker voice characteristics, and low delay in real-time multilingual dialogue. Use when the user wants to benchmark on RealSI, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports VIP.
metadata:
skill_kind: dataset_eval
source_arxiv: 2507.17527
bibtex_key: [REDACTED]
confidence: high
---
# realsi-sst-eval
> Seed LiveInterpret 2.0: End-to-end Simultaneous Speech-to-speech Translation with Your Voice — Cheng et al. (2025) (arXiv:2507.17527, 2025)
## What this evaluates
Evaluates end-to-end simultaneous speech-to-speech translation quality and latency on long-form, multi-domain continuous speech. Probes the model's ability to maintain semantic accuracy, speaker voice characteristics, and low delay in real-time multilingual dialogue.
## Datasets
- **RealSI** — total ?; splits: test (-1)
## Metrics
- `VIP` **(primary)** — range: [0, 100] (score)
- Human evaluation metric measuring the proportion of valid semantic fragments that accurately convey the speaker’s original intent, closely aligning with human interpreter judgments.
- `SVIP` — range: [0, 100] (score)
- Speech-specific extension of VIP measuring the proportion of valid speech semantic fragments within a session, requiring core information accuracy, acceptable latency, appropriate pace, and acoustic clarity.
- `BLEURT` — range: [0, 100] or [-1, 1]
- Automated neural metric for translation quality based on BERT representations.
- `COMET` — range: [0, 100] or [-1, 1]
- Automated neural metric for translation quality using cross-lingual representations.
- `FLAL` — range: [0, ∞) seconds
- First Letter Appearance Lagging: time until the system outputs the first determined translation at the paragraph level.
- `AL` — range: [0, ∞) seconds
- Average Lagging: widely adopted sentence-level latency metric measuring average delay between source and target utterances.
- `LAAL` — range: [0, ∞) seconds
- Length Adaptive Average Lagging: sentence-level latency metric normalized by output length.
## Input / output format
**Input**: Continuous audio speech in Chinese or English (approx. 5 minutes per sample for long-form; sentence-level for short-form).
**Output**: Translated audio speech in the target language (with voice cloning) or translated text, generated simultaneously as the source audio plays.
## Scoring recipe
```python
def calculate_vip_svip(transcript_segments):
valid = 0
total = len(transcript_segments)
for seg in transcript_segments:
if (conveys_core_intent(seg) and
latency_acceptable(seg) and
pace_acceptable(seg) and
clarity_acceptable(seg)):
valid += 1
return (valid / total) * 100
def calculate_latency(source_timestamps, target_timestamps):
al = mean(target_timestamps - source_timestamps)
flal = target_timestamps[0] - source_timestamps[0]
return al, flal
```
## Common pitfalls
- Automated metrics like BLEURT and COMET may not fully reflect true translation capabilities compared to human VIP/SVIP scores.
- Commercial baselines often employ post-hoc rewriting strategies, making direct latency/quality comparisons with human-like simultaneous interpreters misleading.
- Missing table entries indicate lack of feature support (e.g., speech-to-speech) rather than zero performance.
## Evidence (verbatim from paper)
> For text translation quality assessment, we primarily rely on the idea of the human evaluation metric, Valid Information Proportion (VIP) *[[6]]*, which measures how accurately the translation output conveys the speaker’s original intent for each semantic fragment, closely aligning with human interpreter judgments.
## Citation
```bibtex
@misc{cheng2025seedliveinterpret2,
title={Seed LiveInterpret 2.0: End-to-end Simultaneous Speech-to-speech Translation with Your Voice},
author={Cheng et al. (2025)},
year={2025},
note={arXiv:2507.17527}
}
```
- arXiv: 2507.17527