This evaluation protocol assesses the speech synthesis and tokenization capabilities of the Qwen3-TTS model. It probes zero-shot voice cloning, multilingual and cross-lingual generation, controllable voice design, and long-form audio stability across multiple languages. Use when the user wants to benchmark on CommonVoice & Fleurs, LibriSpeech test-clean, Seed-TTS test set, TTS multilingual test set, CV3-Eval, InstructTTSEval, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports WER.
Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Qwen3 Tts Eval?
Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/qhjqhj00-qwen3-tts-eval)
---
name: qwen3-tts-eval
description: This evaluation protocol assesses the speech synthesis and tokenization capabilities of the Qwen3-TTS model. It probes zero-shot voice cloning, multilingual and cross-lingual generation, controllable voice design, and long-form audio stability across multiple languages. Use when the user wants to benchmark on CommonVoice & Fleurs, LibriSpeech test-clean, Seed-TTS test set, TTS multilingual test set, CV3-Eval, InstructTTSEval, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports WER.
metadata:
skill_kind: dataset_eval
source_arxiv: 2601.15621
bibtex_key: hu2026qwen3tts
confidence: high
---
# qwen3-tts-eval
> Qwen3-TTS Technical Report — Hangrui Hu et al. (2026) (arXiv:2601.15621, 2026)
## What this evaluates
This evaluation protocol assesses the speech synthesis and tokenization capabilities of the Qwen3-TTS model. It probes zero-shot voice cloning, multilingual and cross-lingual generation, controllable voice design, and long-form audio stability across multiple languages.
## Datasets
- **CommonVoice & Fleurs** — total ?; splits: test (-1)
- **LibriSpeech test-clean** — total 2620; splits: test (2620)
- **Seed-TTS test set** — total ?; splits: test (-1)
- **TTS multilingual test set** — total ?; splits: test (-1)
- **CV3-Eval** — total ?; splits: test (-1)
- **InstructTTSEval** — total ?; splits: test (-1)
## Metrics
- `WER` **(primary)** — range: percent
- Word Error Rate: (Substitutions + Deletions + Insertions) / Total Reference Words. Lower is better.
- `Speaker Similarity (SIM)` — range: [0, 1]
- Cosine similarity between speaker embeddings extracted from reference and generated audio using a WavLM-based verification model. Higher is better.
- `PESQ` — range: [0, 4.5]
- Perceptual Evaluation of Speech Quality: standard objective metric for speech quality and intelligibility. Higher is better.
- `STOI` — range: [0, 1]
- Short-Time Objective Intelligibility: predicts speech intelligibility based on temporal envelope correlation. Higher is better.
- `UTMOS` — range: [1, 5]
- Unsupervised MOS: neural network-based prediction of mean opinion score for naturalness. Higher is better.
- `APS` — range: [0, 100]
- Attribute Perception and Synthesis accuracy: measures how well the model captures specified voice attributes. Higher is better.
- `DSD` — range: [0, 100]
- Description–Speech Consistency: evaluates alignment between text descriptions and generated acoustic output. Higher is better.
- `RP` — range: [0, 100]
- Response Precision: measures adherence to voice control instructions. Higher is better.
## Input / output format
**Input**: Text instructions (including reference audio/text for voice cloning) and target transcript. For controllable tasks, inputs follow the ChatML format with explicit voice design or editing instructions.
**Output**: Synthesized speech audio waveform.
## Scoring recipe
```python
def compute_wer(generated_audio, reference_text, asr_model):
transcribed = asr_model.transcribe(generated_audio)
return wer_score(transcribed, reference_text) # (S+D+I)/N
def compute_sim(ref_audio, gen_audio, wavlm_model):
ref_emb = wavlm_model.encode(ref_audio)
gen_emb = wavlm_model.encode(gen_audio)
return cosine_similarity(ref_emb, gen_emb)
# For controllable tasks, APS/DSD/RP are computed via automated or human evaluation pipelines aligned with InstructTTSEval guidelines.
```
## Common pitfalls
- ASR transcription models vary in accuracy, directly impacting WER scores; consistent ASR backends are required for fair comparison.
- Speaker similarity (SIM) relies on WavLM embeddings, which may exhibit language bias or require identical sampling rates for reference and generated audio.
- Long-form evaluation uses an internal 100-sample dataset, making independent replication difficult.
## Evidence (verbatim from paper)
> We evaluate the model’s ability to clone unseen voices by measuring content consistency—specifically Word Error Rate (WER)—on the public Seed-TTS test set (Anastassiou et al., [2024]).
## Citation
```bibtex
@misc{hu2026qwen3tts,
title={Qwen3-TTS Technical Report},
author={Hangrui Hu et al. (2026)},
year={2026},
note={arXiv:2601.15621}
}
```
- arXiv: 2601.15621