This evaluation protocol assesses the speech synthesis and tokenization capabilities of the Qwen3-TTS model. It probes zero-shot voice cloning, multilingual and cross-lingual generation, controllable voice design, and long-form audio stability across multiple languages. Use when the user wants to benchmark on CommonVoice & Fleurs, LibriSpeech test-clean, Seed-TTS test set, TTS multilingual test set, CV3-Eval, InstructTTSEval, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports WER.
Scanned 9/11/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add qhjqhj00/research-skills-pool --skill qwen3-tts-eval --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Qwen3 Tts Eval?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/qhjqhj00-qwen3-tts-eval)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: qwen3-tts-eval
description: This evaluation protocol assesses the speech synthesis and tokenization capabilities of the Qwen3-TTS model. It probes zero-shot voice cloning, multilingual and cross-lingual generation, controllable voice design, and long-form audio stability across multiple languages. Use when the user wants to benchmark on CommonVoice & Fleurs, LibriSpeech test-clean, Seed-TTS test set, TTS multilingual test set, CV3-Eval, InstructTTSEval, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports WER.
metadata:
skill_kind: dataset_eval
source_arxiv: 2601.15621
bibtex_key: hu2026qwen3tts
confidence: high
---
# qwen3-tts-eval
> Qwen3-TTS Technical Report — Hangrui Hu et al. (2026) (arXiv:2601.15621, 2026)
## What this evaluates
This evaluation protocol assesses the speech synthesis and tokenization capabilities of the Qwen3-TTS model. It probes zero-shot voice cloning, multilingual and cross-lingual generation, controllable voice design, and long-form audio stability across multiple languages.
## Datasets
- **CommonVoice & Fleurs** — total ?; splits: test (-1)
- **LibriSpeech test-clean** — total 2620; splits: test (2620)
- **Seed-TTS test set** — total ?; splits: test (-1)
- **TTS multilingual test set** — total ?; splits: test (-1)
- **CV3-Eval** — total ?; splits: test (-1)
- **InstructTTSEval** — total ?; splits: test (-1)
## Metrics
- `WER` **(primary)** — range: percent
- Word Error Rate: (Substitutions + Deletions + Insertions) / Total Reference Words. Lower is better.
- `Speaker Similarity (SIM)` — range: [0, 1]
- Cosine similarity between speaker embeddings extracted from reference and generated audio using a WavLM-based verification model. Higher is better.
- `PESQ` — range: [0, 4.5]
- Perceptual Evaluation of Speech Quality: standard objective metric for speech quality and intelligibility. Higher is better.
- `STOI` — range: [0, 1]
- Short-Time Objective Intelligibility: predicts speech intelligibility based on temporal envelope correlation. Higher is better.
- `UTMOS` — range: [1, 5]
- Unsupervised MOS: neural network-based prediction of mean opinion score for naturalness. Higher is better.
- `APS` — range: [0, 100]
- Attribute Perception and Synthesis accuracy: measures how well the model captures specified voice attributes. Higher is better.
- `DSD` — range: [0, 100]
- Description–Speech Consistency: evaluates alignment between text descriptions and generated acoustic output. Higher is better.
- `RP` — range: [0, 100]
- Response Precision: measures adherence to voice control instructions. Higher is better.
## Input / output format
**Input**: Text instructions (including reference audio/text for voice cloning) and target transcript. For controllable tasks, inputs follow the ChatML format with explicit voice design or editing instructions.
**Output**: Synthesized speech audio waveform.
## Scoring recipe
```python
def compute_wer(generated_audio, reference_text, asr_model):
transcribed = asr_model.transcribe(generated_audio)
return wer_score(transcribed, reference_text) # (S+D+I)/N
def compute_sim(ref_audio, gen_audio, wavlm_model):
ref_emb = wavlm_model.encode(ref_audio)
gen_emb = wavlm_model.encode(gen_audio)
return cosine_similarity(ref_emb, gen_emb)
# For controllable tasks, APS/DSD/RP are computed via automated or human evaluation pipelines aligned with InstructTTSEval guidelines.
```
## Common pitfalls
- ASR transcription models vary in accuracy, directly impacting WER scores; consistent ASR backends are required for fair comparison.
- Speaker similarity (SIM) relies on WavLM embeddings, which may exhibit language bias or require identical sampling rates for reference and generated audio.
- Long-form evaluation uses an internal 100-sample dataset, making independent replication difficult.
## Evidence (verbatim from paper)
> We evaluate the model’s ability to clone unseen voices by measuring content consistency—specifically Word Error Rate (WER)—on the public Seed-TTS test set (Anastassiou et al., [2024]).
## Citation
```bibtex
@misc{hu2026qwen3tts,
title={Qwen3-TTS Technical Report},
author={Hangrui Hu et al. (2026)},
year={2026},
note={arXiv:2601.15621}
}
```
- arXiv: 2601.15621
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!