Skip to content
Back to skills

Qwen3 Tts Eval

ASecurity

This evaluation protocol assesses the speech synthesis and tokenization capabilities of the Qwen3-TTS model. It probes zero-shot voice cloning, multilingual and cross-lingual generation, controllable voice design, and long-form audio stability across multiple languages. Use when the user wants to benchmark on CommonVoice & Fleurs, LibriSpeech test-clean, Seed-TTS test set, TTS multilingual test set, CV3-Eval, InstructTTSEval, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports WER.

  • 3 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 4 views
  • Added September 11, 2026
researchpythonbackend

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned September 11, 2026

npx -y skills add qhjqhj00/research-skills-pool --skill qwen3-tts-eval --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Qwen3 Tts Eval?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Qwen3 Tts Eval
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/qhjqhj00-qwen3-tts-eval/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/qhjqhj00-qwen3-tts-eval)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: qwen3-tts-eval
description: This evaluation protocol assesses the speech synthesis and tokenization capabilities of the Qwen3-TTS model. It probes zero-shot voice cloning, multilingual and cross-lingual generation, controllable voice design, and long-form audio stability across multiple languages. Use when the user wants to benchmark on CommonVoice & Fleurs, LibriSpeech test-clean, Seed-TTS test set, TTS multilingual test set, CV3-Eval, InstructTTSEval, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports WER.
metadata:
  skill_kind: dataset_eval
  source_arxiv: 2601.15621
  bibtex_key: hu2026qwen3tts
  confidence: high
---

# qwen3-tts-eval

> Qwen3-TTS Technical Report — Hangrui Hu et al. (2026) (arXiv:2601.15621, 2026)

## What this evaluates

This evaluation protocol assesses the speech synthesis and tokenization capabilities of the Qwen3-TTS model. It probes zero-shot voice cloning, multilingual and cross-lingual generation, controllable voice design, and long-form audio stability across multiple languages.

## Datasets

- **CommonVoice & Fleurs** — total ?; splits: test (-1)
- **LibriSpeech test-clean** — total 2620; splits: test (2620)
- **Seed-TTS test set** — total ?; splits: test (-1)
- **TTS multilingual test set** — total ?; splits: test (-1)
- **CV3-Eval** — total ?; splits: test (-1)
- **InstructTTSEval** — total ?; splits: test (-1)

## Metrics

- `WER` **(primary)** — range: percent
  - Word Error Rate: (Substitutions + Deletions + Insertions) / Total Reference Words. Lower is better.
- `Speaker Similarity (SIM)` — range: [0, 1]
  - Cosine similarity between speaker embeddings extracted from reference and generated audio using a WavLM-based verification model. Higher is better.
- `PESQ` — range: [0, 4.5]
  - Perceptual Evaluation of Speech Quality: standard objective metric for speech quality and intelligibility. Higher is better.
- `STOI` — range: [0, 1]
  - Short-Time Objective Intelligibility: predicts speech intelligibility based on temporal envelope correlation. Higher is better.
- `UTMOS` — range: [1, 5]
  - Unsupervised MOS: neural network-based prediction of mean opinion score for naturalness. Higher is better.
- `APS` — range: [0, 100]
  - Attribute Perception and Synthesis accuracy: measures how well the model captures specified voice attributes. Higher is better.
- `DSD` — range: [0, 100]
  - Description–Speech Consistency: evaluates alignment between text descriptions and generated acoustic output. Higher is better.
- `RP` — range: [0, 100]
  - Response Precision: measures adherence to voice control instructions. Higher is better.

## Input / output format

**Input**: Text instructions (including reference audio/text for voice cloning) and target transcript. For controllable tasks, inputs follow the ChatML format with explicit voice design or editing instructions.

**Output**: Synthesized speech audio waveform.

## Scoring recipe

```python
def compute_wer(generated_audio, reference_text, asr_model):
    transcribed = asr_model.transcribe(generated_audio)
    return wer_score(transcribed, reference_text)  # (S+D+I)/N

def compute_sim(ref_audio, gen_audio, wavlm_model):
    ref_emb = wavlm_model.encode(ref_audio)
    gen_emb = wavlm_model.encode(gen_audio)
    return cosine_similarity(ref_emb, gen_emb)

# For controllable tasks, APS/DSD/RP are computed via automated or human evaluation pipelines aligned with InstructTTSEval guidelines.
```

## Common pitfalls

- ASR transcription models vary in accuracy, directly impacting WER scores; consistent ASR backends are required for fair comparison.
- Speaker similarity (SIM) relies on WavLM embeddings, which may exhibit language bias or require identical sampling rates for reference and generated audio.
- Long-form evaluation uses an internal 100-sample dataset, making independent replication difficult.

## Evidence (verbatim from paper)

> We evaluate the model’s ability to clone unseen voices by measuring content consistency—specifically Word Error Rate (WER)—on the public Seed-TTS test set (Anastassiou et al., [2024]).

## Citation

```bibtex
@misc{hu2026qwen3tts,
  title={Qwen3-TTS Technical Report},
  author={Hangrui Hu et al. (2026)},
  year={2026},
  note={arXiv:2601.15621}
}
```

- arXiv: 2601.15621

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.