Evaluates mathematical reasoning, knowledge-oriented language understanding, and challenging reasoning capabilities of LLMs fine-tuned on domain-specific corpora. Use when the user wants to benchmark on MATH, GSM8K, MMLU, AGIEval, BIG-Bench Hard, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports accuracy.
Scanned 9/11/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add qhjqhj00/research-skills-pool --skill qoc-eval --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Qoc Eval?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/qhjqhj00-qoc-eval)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: qoc-eval
description: Evaluates mathematical reasoning, knowledge-oriented language understanding, and challenging reasoning capabilities of LLMs fine-tuned on domain-specific corpora. Use when the user wants to benchmark on MATH, GSM8K, MMLU, AGIEval, BIG-Bench Hard, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports accuracy.
metadata:
skill_kind: dataset_eval
source_arxiv: 2401.14624
bibtex_key: fei2024unearthing
confidence: medium
---
# qoc-eval
> Unearthing Large Scale Domain-Specific Knowledge from Public Corpora — Fei et al. (2024) (arXiv:2401.14624, 2024)
## What this evaluates
Evaluates mathematical reasoning, knowledge-oriented language understanding, and challenging reasoning capabilities of LLMs fine-tuned on domain-specific corpora.
## Datasets
- **MATH** — total ?; splits: test (-1)
- **GSM8K** — total ?; splits: test (-1)
- **MMLU** — total ?; splits: test (-1)
- **AGIEval** — total ?; splits: test (-1)
- **BIG-Bench Hard** — total ?; splits: test (-1)
## Metrics
- `accuracy` **(primary)** — range: [0, 1] or percent
- Standard benchmark metrics: exact-match or pass@1 for mathematical tasks (MATH, GSM8K), and multiple-choice accuracy for knowledge/reasoning tasks (MMLU, AGIEval, BIG-Bench Hard).
## Input / output format
**Input**: Natural language questions or prompts from standard benchmarks.
**Output**: Model-generated text responses.
## Scoring recipe
```python
For each dataset instance:
pred = model.generate(prompt)
gold = extract_answer(gold_text)
score = 1 if pred == gold else 0
metric_value = mean(scores) * 100
```
## Common pitfalls
- Prompting strategy (zero-shot vs few-shot) and decoding parameters are not specified in the provided text.
- Answer extraction rules vary across benchmarks and are deferred to Appendix B.
- Scores in Table 3 are presented as raw numbers without explicit percentage signs, requiring careful interpretation.
## Evidence (verbatim from paper)
> For the selection of evaluation datasets, we opted for three distinct capabilities to assess both Llama2-QoC and Mistral-QoC. These encompassed mathematical reasoning datasets such as Math, GSM8K, knowledge-oriented language understanding datasets including MMLU, AGIEval, and challenging reasoning tasks BIG-Bench hard.
## Citation
```bibtex
@misc{fei2024unearthing,
title={Unearthing Large Scale Domain-Specific Knowledge from Public Corpora},
author={Fei et al. (2024)},
year={2024},
note={arXiv:2401.14624}
}
```
- arXiv: 2401.14624
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!