Evaluates the impact of ultra-low precision weight quantization (down to 2 bits) on BERTBASE performance across standard NLP tasks. It compares Hessian-guided mixed and group-wise quantization strategies against direct quantization baselines to measure accuracy retention versus model compression. Use when the user wants to benchmark on SST-2, MNLI, CoNLL-03, SQuAD, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports Acc.
Scanned 9/11/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add qhjqhj00/research-skills-pool --skill qbert-quantization-eval --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Qbert Quantization Eval?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/qhjqhj00-qbert-quantization-eval)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: qbert-quantization-eval
description: Evaluates the impact of ultra-low precision weight quantization (down to 2 bits) on BERTBASE performance across standard NLP tasks. It compares Hessian-guided mixed and group-wise quantization strategies against direct quantization baselines to measure accuracy retention versus model compression. Use when the user wants to benchmark on SST-2, MNLI, CoNLL-03, SQuAD, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports Acc.
metadata:
skill_kind: dataset_eval
source_arxiv: 1909.05840
bibtex_key: shen2019qbert
confidence: high
---
# qbert-quantization-eval
> Q-BERT: Hessian Based Ultra Low Precision Quantization of BERT — Shen et al. (2019) (arXiv:1909.05840, 2019)
## What this evaluates
Evaluates the impact of ultra-low precision weight quantization (down to 2 bits) on BERTBASE performance across standard NLP tasks. It compares Hessian-guided mixed and group-wise quantization strategies against direct quantization baselines to measure accuracy retention versus model compression.
## Datasets
- **SST-2** — total ?; splits: dev (-1)
- **MNLI** — total ?; splits: dev (-1)
- **CoNLL-03** — total ?; splits: dev (-1)
- **SQuAD** — total ?; splits: dev (-1)
## Metrics
- `Acc` **(primary)** — range: percent
- Percentage of correctly predicted class labels out of total instances.
- `F1` — range: [0, 1]
- Harmonic mean of precision and recall, computed per class and averaged (macro or micro depending on task convention).
- `Exact Match (EM)` — range: [0, 1]
- Fraction of predictions where the predicted answer span exactly matches the ground truth span.
## Input / output format
**Input**: Tokenized text sequences (single sentences or sentence pairs) fed into BERTBASE.
**Output**: Predicted class labels for classification tasks (SST-2, MNLI, CoNLL-03) or predicted answer spans for SQuAD.
## Scoring recipe
```python
def compute_metrics(predictions, gold, task):
if task in ['sst2', 'mnli']:
return sum(p == g for p, g in zip(predictions, gold)) / len(gold)
elif task == 'conll03':
return f1_score(gold, predictions, average='macro')
elif task == 'squad':
em = sum(exact_match(p, g) for p, g in zip(predictions, gold)) / len(gold)
f1 = qa_f1_score(gold, predictions)
return em, f1
```
## Common pitfalls
- 3-bit quantization is not natively supported in hardware; results often assume casting to 4/8 bits for execution, which affects actual speedup vs memory savings.
- SQuAD fine-tuning exhibits convergence issues (negative Hessian eigenvalues), making it unusually sensitive to quantization compared to other tasks.
- Group-wise quantization accuracy gains saturate at 128 groups; increasing groups further yields diminishing returns while increasing LUT overhead.
## Evidence (verbatim from paper)
> Table 1: Quantization results for BERTBASE on Natural Language Understanding tasks. ... Acc | Size | Size-w/o-e ... Q-BERT | 8 | 8 | 92.88 | 103.9 | 81.2
## Citation
```bibtex
@misc{shen2019qbert,
title={Q-BERT: Hessian Based Ultra Low Precision Quantization of BERT},
author={Shen et al. (2019)},
year={2019},
note={arXiv:1909.05840}
}
```
- arXiv: 1909.05840
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!