Evaluates the phonological accent fidelity and prosodic naturalness of Indic text-to-speech systems across Hindi, Telugu, and Tamil. It decomposes accent into per-phoneme dimensions (retroflex, aspiration, Tamil-zha, vowel-length) and corpus-level distributional metrics, revealing gaps between intelligibility and native-like accent. Use when the user wants to benchmark on PSP Benchmark Sets, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports FAD.
Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Psp Accent Eval?
Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/qhjqhj00-psp-accent-eval)
---
name: psp-accent-eval
description: Evaluates the phonological accent fidelity and prosodic naturalness of Indic text-to-speech systems across Hindi, Telugu, and Tamil. It decomposes accent into per-phoneme dimensions (retroflex, aspiration, Tamil-zha, vowel-length) and corpus-level distributional metrics, revealing gaps between intelligibility and native-like accent. Use when the user wants to benchmark on PSP Benchmark Sets, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports FAD.
metadata:
skill_kind: dataset_eval
source_arxiv: 2604.25476
bibtex_key: menta2026psp
confidence: high
---
# psp-accent-eval
> PSP: An Interpretable Per-Dimension Accent Benchmark for Indic Text-to-Speech — Menta et al. (2026) (arXiv:2604.25476, 2026)
## What this evaluates
Evaluates the phonological accent fidelity and prosodic naturalness of Indic text-to-speech systems across Hindi, Telugu, and Tamil. It decomposes accent into per-phoneme dimensions (retroflex, aspiration, Tamil-zha, vowel-length) and corpus-level distributional metrics, revealing gaps between intelligibility and native-like accent.
## Datasets
- **PSP Benchmark Sets** — total 300; splits: pilot (10), golden (300); repo https://github.com/praxelhq/praxy
## Metrics
- `FAD` **(primary)** — range: other
- Fréchet Audio Distance computed between Wav2Vec2-XLS-R phonetic embeddings of generated audio and a native reference distribution (1000 utterances). Lower values indicate closer alignment to native acoustic distributions.
- `PSD` — range: other
- Prosodic Signature Divergence measuring distance in a 5D prosodic space (pitch range, log-F0, speech rate, nPVI, log-duration) from native speaker centroids. Lower values indicate more natural prosody.
- `Retroflex/Aspiration/Tamil-zha/Length Fidelity` — range: percent
- Per-token collapse rates calculated via forced alignment, measuring the percentage of phonological tokens correctly produced versus collapsed. Expressed as a percentage.
- `LLM-WER` — range: percent
- Word error rate computed by a Qwen-2.5-72B semantic judge over Whisper ASR transcripts to measure semantic intelligibility.
## Input / output format
**Input**: Text prompts in Hindi, Telugu, or Tamil, stratified by phonological density (retroflex-heavy, aspiration-heavy, length-heavy, conjunct-heavy, general). Commercial systems also receive voice gender prompts.
**Output**: Synthesized audio files (WAV) for each text prompt.
## Scoring recipe
```python
def score_system(generated_audios, native_reference_audios, ground_truth_texts):
# 1. Per-token collapse rates via forced alignment
aligned = forced_align(generated_audios)
collapse_rate = sum(1 for t in aligned if t.feature == 'collapsed') / len(aligned)
# 2. FAD using Wav2Vec2-XLS-R embeddings
gen_emb = wav2vec2_xls_r.encode(generated_audios)
ref_emb = wav2vec2_xls_r.encode(native_reference_audios) # 1000 utts
FAD = frechet_distance(gen_emb.mean(), gen_emb.cov(), ref_emb.mean(), ref_emb.cov())
# 3. PSD from prosodic features
prosodic_vec = extract_prosody(generated_audios) # [pitch_range, log_F0, rate, nPVI, log_dur]
PSD = cosine_distance(prosodic_vec, native_prosodic_centroid)
# 4. LLM-WER
transcript = whisper.transcribe(generated_audios)
LLM_WER = qwen2_5_72b.compute_wer(transcript, ground_truth_texts)
return collapse_rate, FAD, PSD, LLM_WER
```
## Common pitfalls
- WER and FAD/PSD orderings are often inversely correlated; a system with the lowest WER may rank last on accent metrics.
- Pilot sets have sample-size asymmetry (commercial systems use 2 voice genders/20 wavs, open-source use 1 voice/10 wavs), which can skew preliminary collapse rates.
- FAD and PSD are corpus-level metrics requiring large native reference distributions (1000 and ~500 utterances), not per-utterance scores.
- Improving spectral distance (FAD) can sometimes regress prosodic naturalness (PSD) if only acoustic weights are updated without prosodic conditioning.
## Evidence (verbatim from paper)
> Each utterance is scored on all applicable per-phoneme PSP dimensions; corpus-level FAD and PSD are computed once per (system, language) against native reference distributions of 1000 and 500 utterances respectively.
## Citation
```bibtex
@misc{menta2026psp,
title={PSP: An Interpretable Per-Dimension Accent Benchmark for Indic Text-to-Speech},
author={Menta et al. (2026)},
year={2026},
note={arXiv:2604.25476}
}
```
- arXiv: 2604.25476