Classifies the sentiment polarity of specific phrases within tweets, requiring models to handle contextual disambiguation, sarcasm, and informal language. Use when the user wants to benchmark on Twitter2015-test, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports macro-averaged F1.
Scanned 9/11/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add qhjqhj00/research-skills-pool --skill phrase-level-polarity-eval --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Phrase Level Polarity Eval?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/qhjqhj00-phrase-level-polarity-eval)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: phrase-level-polarity-eval
description: Classifies the sentiment polarity of specific phrases within tweets, requiring models to handle contextual disambiguation, sarcasm, and informal language. Use when the user wants to benchmark on Twitter2015-test, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports macro-averaged F1.
metadata:
skill_kind: dataset_eval
source_arxiv: 1912.02387
bibtex_key: rosenthal2015semeval
confidence: high
---
# phrase-level-polarity-eval
> SemEval-2015 Task 10: Sentiment Analysis in Twitter — Rosenthal et al. (2015) (SemEval-2015 / arXiv:1912.02387, 2015)
## What this evaluates
Classifies the sentiment polarity of specific phrases within tweets, requiring models to handle contextual disambiguation, sarcasm, and informal language.
## Datasets
- **Twitter2015-test** — total ?; splits: test (-1)
## Metrics
- `macro-averaged F1` **(primary)** — range: [0, 1]
- Harmonic mean of precision and recall averaged across all classes (positive, negative, neutral). F1 = 2 * (macro_prec * macro_rec) / (macro_prec + macro_rec).
## Input / output format
**Input**: A phrase extracted from a tweet.
**Output**: Sentiment polarity label (positive, negative, or neutral).
## Scoring recipe
```python
prec = rec = 0
for class in ['pos', 'neg', 'neu']:
prec += precision(y_true, y_pred, class)
rec += recall(y_true, y_pred, class)
macro_prec = prec / 3
macro_rec = rec / 3
f1 = 2 * (macro_prec * macro_rec) / (macro_prec + macro_rec)
```
## Common pitfalls
- Class imbalance is significant; the majority class baseline achieves ~38% F1, so models must significantly outperform simple majority voting.
- Sarcasm and slang can flip polarity, requiring contextual models rather than simple bag-of-words approaches.
## Evidence (verbatim from paper)
> The results (macro-averaged F1 score) for subtask A are shown in Table 10. The participating systems are ranked by their score on the Twitter2015-test dataset, which is the official ranking for subtask A
## Citation
```bibtex
@misc{rosenthal2015semeval,
title={SemEval-2015 Task 10: Sentiment Analysis in Twitter},
author={Rosenthal et al. (2015)},
year={2015},
note={SemEval-2015 / arXiv:1912.02387}
}
```
- arXiv: 1912.02387
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!