Skip to content
Back to skills

Pap 12k Eval

ASecurity

Evaluates a model's ability to predict affordance regions in 360° panoramic imagery. It probes spatial reasoning, handling of extreme scale variations, and robustness to geometric distortions inherent in equirectangular projection formats. Use when the user wants to benchmark on PAP-12K, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports gIoU.

  • 3 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 0 views
  • Added September 11, 2026
researchpythonangulargitperformance

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned September 11, 2026

npx -y skills add qhjqhj00/research-skills-pool --skill pap-12k-eval --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Pap 12k Eval?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Pap 12k Eval
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/qhjqhj00-pap-12k-eval/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/qhjqhj00-pap-12k-eval)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: pap-12k-eval
description: Evaluates a model's ability to predict affordance regions in 360° panoramic imagery. It probes spatial reasoning, handling of extreme scale variations, and robustness to geometric distortions inherent in equirectangular projection formats. Use when the user wants to benchmark on PAP-12K, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports gIoU.
metadata:
  skill_kind: dataset_eval
  source_arxiv: 2603.15558
  bibtex_key: [REDACTED]
  confidence: high
---

# pap-12k-eval

> Panoramic Affordance Prediction — Zhang et al. (2026) (arXiv:2603.15558, 2026)

## What this evaluates

Evaluates a model's ability to predict affordance regions in 360° panoramic imagery. It probes spatial reasoning, handling of extreme scale variations, and robustness to geometric distortions inherent in equirectangular projection formats.

## Datasets

- **PAP-12K** — total 12000; splits: test (-1); repo https://github.com/EnVision-Research/PAP

## Metrics

- `gIoU` **(primary)** — range: percent
  - Average Intersection-over-Union across all test samples, measuring overall segmentation quality.
- `cIoU` — range: percent
  - Cumulative intersection over cumulative union across the entire dataset, providing a dataset-level quality measure less sensitive to individual object sizes.
- `P@50` — range: percent
  - Percentage of predictions with an IoU score exceeding 0.5, evaluating the model's ability to generate high-quality predictions.
- `P@50:95` — range: percent
  - Average precision calculated across a range of IoU thresholds from 0.5 to 0.95 with 0.05 increments, providing a stricter and more fine-grained assessment of segmentation accuracy.

## Input / output format

**Input**: Ultra-high-resolution (12K) 360° panoramic images in equirectangular projection format, accompanied by a textual affordance query/prompt.

**Output**: Binary affordance mask or segmentation map indicating the predicted region for the queried affordance.

## Scoring recipe

```python
def compute_metrics(pred_masks, gt_masks):
    ious = [iou(p, g) for p, g in zip(pred_masks, gt_masks)]
    gIoU = sum(ious) / len(ious) * 100
    cIoU = (sum(p.sum() for p in pred_masks) & sum(g.sum() for g in gt_masks)) / \
           (sum(p.sum() for p in pred_masks) | sum(g.sum() for g in gt_masks)) * 100
    P50 = sum(1 for i in ious if i > 0.5) / len(ious) * 100
    thresholds = [0.5 + 0.05 * i for i in range(10)]
    P50_95 = mean([sum(1 for i in ious if i >= t) / len(ious) for t in thresholds]) * 100
    return gIoU, cIoU, P50, P50_95
```

## Common pitfalls

- Standard 2D perspective models suffer severe performance degradation due to geometric distortion in equirectangular panoramic images.
- Objects split across the left/right image boundaries are frequently missed or incorrectly segmented by baseline methods.
- Extreme scale variations (objects <0.1% or >30% of image area) require multi-scale routing to avoid localization failure.

## Evidence (verbatim from paper)

> Following the standard evaluation protocol in affordance prediction (Wang et al., 2025a; Zhang et al., 2025c), we adopt four complementary metrics to comprehensively assess prediction quality, including: 1) $gIoU$ (Generalized IoU): The average Intersection-over-Union across all test samples, measuring the overall segmentation quality of the predicted affordance regions. 2) $cIoU$ (Cumulative IoU): The cumulative intersection over cumulative union across the entire dataset, providing a dataset-level quality measure that is less sensitive to the size of individual objects. 3) $P@50$ (Precision at IoU=0.5): The percentage of predictions with an IoU score exceeding 0.5, evaluating the model's ability to generate high-quality predictions. 4) $P@50:95$ : The average precision calculated across a range of IoU thresholds from 0.5 to 0.95 with 0.05 increments, providing a stricter and more fine-grained assessment of segmentation accuracy.

## Citation

```bibtex
@misc{zhang2026panoramic,
  title={Panoramic Affordance Prediction},
  author={Zhang et al. (2026)},
  year={2026},
  note={arXiv:2603.15558}
}
```

- arXiv: 2603.15558

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.