Evaluates video understanding models on ophthalmic surgical workflows, including recognizing primary surgery types, classifying hierarchical surgical phases and operations, localizing phase boundaries in time, and anticipating upcoming surgical phases. Use when the user wants to benchmark on OphNet, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports Top-1 Accuracy.
Scanned 9/11/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add qhjqhj00/research-skills-pool --skill ophnet-eval --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Ophnet Eval?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/qhjqhj00-ophnet-eval)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: ophnet-eval
description: Evaluates video understanding models on ophthalmic surgical workflows, including recognizing primary surgery types, classifying hierarchical surgical phases and operations, localizing phase boundaries in time, and anticipating upcoming surgical phases. Use when the user wants to benchmark on OphNet, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports Top-1 Accuracy.
metadata:
skill_kind: dataset_eval
source_arxiv: 2406.07471
bibtex_key: hu2024ophnet
confidence: high
---
# ophnet-eval
> OphNet: A Large-Scale Video Benchmark for Ophthalmic Surgical Workflow Understanding — Ming Hu et al. (2024) (arXiv:2406.07471, 2024)
## What this evaluates
Evaluates video understanding models on ophthalmic surgical workflows, including recognizing primary surgery types, classifying hierarchical surgical phases and operations, localizing phase boundaries in time, and anticipating upcoming surgical phases.
## Datasets
- **OphNet** — total 2278; splits: train (1449), val (205), test (424)
## Metrics
- `Top-1 Accuracy` **(primary)** — range: [0, 1]
- Fraction of instances where the predicted class matches the ground truth label.
- `Top-5 Accuracy` — range: [0, 1]
- Fraction of instances where the ground truth label appears in the model's top 5 predicted classes.
- `mAP` — range: [0, 1]
- Mean Average Precision computed across classes at Intersection over Union thresholds [0.1, 0.3, 0.5, 0.7].
- `Average mAP` — range: [0, 1]
- Arithmetic mean of mAP scores across the four IoU thresholds [0.1, 0.3, 0.5, 0.7].
- `Top-1 Accuracy@ObservationRatio` — range: [0, 1]
- Fraction of correctly predicted next phases given a masked portion of the surgical sequence, evaluated at observation ratios [0.1, 0.3, 0.5, 0.7].
- `Average Top-1 Accuracy` — range: [0, 1]
- Arithmetic mean of Top-1 Accuracy across the four observation ratios.
## Input / output format
**Input**: Untrimmed surgical videos (presence recognition), trimmed video segments (phase/operation recognition), or concatenated RGB + optical flow feature embeddings (uniformly interpolated to 100 fixed-length frames) for localization/anticipation baselines.
**Output**: Class labels (surgery type, phase, or operation), temporal boundaries (start/end timestamps) for localization, or predicted next phase label for anticipation.
## Scoring recipe
```python
# Top-1/Top-5 Accuracy (Classification)
correct_top1 = sum(1 for p, g in zip(preds, gold) if p == g)
top1_acc = correct_top1 / len(gold)
correct_top5 = sum(1 for p, g in zip(preds, gold) if g in p[:5])
top5_acc = correct_top5 / len(gold)
# mAP / Average mAP (Localization)
aps = []
for iou_thresh in [0.1, 0.3, 0.5, 0.7]:
aps.append(compute_ap(predictions, gold, iou_threshold=iou_thresh))
avg_mAP = sum(aps) / len(aps)
# Top-1 Accuracy@ObservationRatio (Anticipation)
accs = []
for obs_ratio in [0.1, 0.3, 0.5, 0.7]:
masked_preds = model.predict(masked_sequence, ratio=obs_ratio)
accs.append(sum(1 for p, g in zip(masked_preds, gold) if p == g) / len(gold))
avg_top1_acc = sum(accs) / len(accs)
```
## Common pitfalls
- Variable video durations require uniform interpolation to exactly 100 fixed-length features before feeding to localization/anticipation models.
- Tags with fewer than 20 segments are filtered out, and 'Operation Gap'/'Invalid' labels are excluded from evaluation.
- Anticipation task uses random masking of phase sequences at specific observation ratios (0.1 to 0.9) rather than fixed temporal windows.
## Evidence (verbatim from paper)
> The results indicate that the TriDet model with a SwinViviT backbone outperforms other combinations, achieving the highest mAP scores across most IoU thresholds, with notable scores of 61.0% (IoU=0.1), 57.1% (IoU=0.3), 47.1% (IoU=0.5), and 33.1% (IoU=0.7), resulting in an average mAP of 50.4%.
## Citation
```bibtex
@misc{hu2024ophnet,
title={OphNet: A Large-Scale Video Benchmark for Ophthalmic Surgical Workflow Understanding},
author={Ming Hu et al. (2024)},
year={2024},
note={arXiv:2406.07471}
}
```
- arXiv: 2406.07471
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!