Oneig Bench Eval

---
name: oneig-bench-eval
description: Measures broader image generation capabilities across five axes: alignment, text rendering, reasoning, style, and diversity. Use when the user wants to benchmark on OneIG-Bench, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports Overall.
metadata:
  skill_kind: dataset_eval
  source_arxiv: 2604.12163
  bibtex_key: [REDACTED]
  confidence: high
---

# oneig-bench-eval

> Nucleus-Image: Sparse MoE for Image Generation — Akiti et al. (2026) (arXiv:2604.12163, 2026)

## What this evaluates

Measures broader image generation capabilities across five axes: alignment, text rendering, reasoning, style, and diversity.

## Datasets

- **OneIG-Bench** — total ?; splits: test (-1)

## Metrics

- `Overall` **(primary)** — range: [0, 1]
  - Mean score across five axes: alignment, text rendering, reasoning, style, and diversity.

## Input / output format

**Input**: Text prompt designed to test alignment, text rendering, reasoning, style, and diversity.

**Output**: Generated image at 1024x1024 resolution, 50 inference steps, CFG scale 8.0.

## Scoring recipe

```python
dims = ['alignment', 'text', 'reasoning', 'style', 'diversity']
scores = {d: [] for d in dims}
for prompt in prompts:
    img = model.generate(prompt, steps=50, cfg=8.0, res=1024)
    for d in dims:
        scores[d].append(evaluator.score(img, prompt, dimension=d))
overall = mean(mean(v) for v in scores.values())
return overall
```

## Common pitfalls

- Diversity scores tend to be lower across most models, indicating a known limitation in generating varied outputs from similar prompts.
- Text rendering and style evaluation may rely on specialized models or human-like scoring that can vary in strictness.

## Evidence (verbatim from paper)

> Nucleus-Image achieves an overall score of 0.522, placing it among the top tier of open and proprietary models and ahead of Imagen4 (0.515) and Recraft V3 (0.502).

## Citation

```bibtex
@misc{akiti2026nucleusimage,
  title={Nucleus-Image: Sparse MoE for Image Generation},
  author={Akiti et al. (2026)},
  year={2026},
  note={arXiv:2604.12163}
}
```

- arXiv: 2604.12163