Skip to content
Back to skills

Omnispectra Eval

ASecurity

Evaluates a foundation model's ability to process native-resolution astronomical spectra of variable lengths without resampling, and assesses its zero-shot, few-shot, and supervised performance on stellar property estimation and source classification tasks across diverse spectroscopic surveys. Use when the user wants to benchmark on OmniSpectra Multi-Survey Corpus, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports Mean-Squared Error.

  • 3 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 2 views
  • Added September 11, 2026
researchpythonperformance

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned September 11, 2026

npx -y skills add qhjqhj00/research-skills-pool --skill omnispectra-eval --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Omnispectra Eval?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Omnispectra Eval
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/qhjqhj00-omnispectra-eval/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/qhjqhj00-omnispectra-eval)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: omnispectra-eval
description: Evaluates a foundation model's ability to process native-resolution astronomical spectra of variable lengths without resampling, and assesses its zero-shot, few-shot, and supervised performance on stellar property estimation and source classification tasks across diverse spectroscopic surveys. Use when the user wants to benchmark on OmniSpectra Multi-Survey Corpus, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports Mean-Squared Error.
metadata:
  skill_kind: dataset_eval
  source_arxiv: 2601.15351
  bibtex_key: [REDACTED]
  confidence: high
---

# omnispectra-eval

> OmniSpectra: A Unified Foundation Model for Native Resolution Astronomical Spectra — Islam et al. (2026) (arXiv:2601.15351, 2026)

## What this evaluates

Evaluates a foundation model's ability to process native-resolution astronomical spectra of variable lengths without resampling, and assesses its zero-shot, few-shot, and supervised performance on stellar property estimation and source classification tasks across diverse spectroscopic surveys.

## Datasets

- **OmniSpectra Multi-Survey Corpus** — total 5543000; splits: train (5488000), val (55000)

## Metrics

- `Mean-Squared Error` **(primary)** — range: other
  - Standard mean squared error calculated as the average of the squared differences between predicted and true property values: MSE = (1/N) * Σ(y_true - y_pred)^2. Lower values indicate better performance. The paper reports a weighted average across multiple stellar targets.

## Input / output format

**Input**: Variable-length astronomical spectra provided as HDF5 files, tokenized via overlapping patches of 20 flux points (10-point overlap), with each instance independently normalized. Wavelengths are encoded sinusoidally.

**Output**: Continuous numerical values for stellar/galactic properties (e.g., temperature, metallicity) or class labels for source classification, depending on the downstream task.

## Scoring recipe

```python
def compute_mse(y_true, y_pred, weights=None):
    squared_diffs = (y_true - y_pred) ** 2
    if weights is not None:
        mse = np.average(squared_diffs, weights=weights)
    else:
        mse = np.mean(squared_diffs)
    return mse
```

## Common pitfalls

- Downstream evaluation splits are randomly sampled (20k examples, 50/50 train-test) per dataset rather than using standard held-out survey splits, which may not reflect real-world domain shift.
- The validation set (55k spectra) is a fixed 1% random subsample of the pretraining corpus, not a separate downstream validation set.
- Variable-length inputs require adaptive patching; models that force fixed-length resampling will lose native resolution fidelity.

## Evidence (verbatim from paper)

> Table 3: Mean-Squared Error (↓) of star property estimation on the SDSS dataset and its subsets. We report the weighted average across the targets. The best and second-best results are in bold and underline. OmniSpectra significantly outperforms other foundation models and even custom supervised models with little tuning.

## Citation

```bibtex
@misc{islam2026omnispectra,
  title={OmniSpectra: A Unified Foundation Model for Native Resolution Astronomical Spectra},
  author={Islam et al. (2026)},
  year={2026},
  note={arXiv:2601.15351}
}
```

- arXiv: 2601.15351

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.