This benchmark probes an agent's ability to perform long-horizon question answering over audio-video streams. It specifically tests fine-grained multimodal retrieval, multi-turn tool calling, and budget-aware reasoning when key evidence is scattered across time. Use when the user wants to benchmark on OmniVideoBench, WorldSense, Daily-Omni, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports accuracy.
Scanned 9/11/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add qhjqhj00/research-skills-pool --skill omnimodal-qa-eval --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Omnimodal Qa Eval?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/qhjqhj00-omnimodal-qa-eval)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: omnimodal-qa-eval
description: This benchmark probes an agent's ability to perform long-horizon question answering over audio-video streams. It specifically tests fine-grained multimodal retrieval, multi-turn tool calling, and budget-aware reasoning when key evidence is scattered across time. Use when the user wants to benchmark on OmniVideoBench, WorldSense, Daily-Omni, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports accuracy.
metadata:
skill_kind: dataset_eval
source_arxiv: 2602.03707
bibtex_key: zhu2026omniragagent
confidence: high
---
# omnimodal-qa-eval
> OmniRAG-Agent: Agentic Omnimodal Reasoning for Low-Resource Long Audio-Video Question Answering — Zhu et al. (2026) (arXiv:2602.03707, 2026)
## What this evaluates
This benchmark probes an agent's ability to perform long-horizon question answering over audio-video streams. It specifically tests fine-grained multimodal retrieval, multi-turn tool calling, and budget-aware reasoning when key evidence is scattered across time.
## Datasets
- **OmniVideoBench** — total ?; splits: test (-1)
- **WorldSense** — total ?; splits: test (-1)
- **Daily-Omni** — total ?; splits: test (-1)
## Metrics
- `accuracy` **(primary)** — range: percent
- Percentage of correctly answered questions. The paper reports accuracy on each ability subset and averages them to measure overall performance across heterogeneous reasoning skills.
## Input / output format
**Input**: Long audio-video streams paired with natural language questions.
**Output**: Textual answers to the questions.
## Scoring recipe
```python
def compute_accuracy(predictions, gold):
correct = sum(1 for p, g in zip(predictions, gold) if p.strip().lower() == g.strip().lower())
return (correct / len(gold)) * 100
```
## Common pitfalls
- Averaging accuracy across heterogeneous ability subsets may mask performance on specific reasoning skills.
- The exact answer verification method (string match vs. LLM judge) follows each benchmark's official protocol but is not explicitly detailed in the main text.
- Performance varies significantly with the retrieval budget (number of clips) and RL training state, so results are not static.
## Evidence (verbatim from paper)
> For these datasets, we report accuracy on each ability subset and their average score, which measures overall performance across heterogeneous reasoning skills.
## Citation
```bibtex
@misc{zhu2026omniragagent,
title={OmniRAG-Agent: Agentic Omnimodal Reasoning for Low-Resource Long Audio-Video Question Answering},
author={Zhu et al. (2026)},
year={2026},
note={arXiv:2602.03707}
}
```
- arXiv: 2602.03707
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!