Evaluates a model's ability to classify breast MRI lesions into three clinical categories (no lesion, benign, malignant) using real-world, multi-center imaging data with high heterogeneity in scanners and protocols. It probes robustness to domain shift by comparing in-distribution cross-validation performance against an out-of-distribution test set from unseen centers. Use when the user wants to benchmark on ODELIA Breast MRI Dataset, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports Macro AUC.
Scanned 9/11/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add qhjqhj00/research-skills-pool --skill odelia-breast-mri-eval --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Odelia Breast Mri Eval?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/qhjqhj00-odelia-breast-mri-eval)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: odelia-breast-mri-eval
description: Evaluates a model's ability to classify breast MRI lesions into three clinical categories (no lesion, benign, malignant) using real-world, multi-center imaging data with high heterogeneity in scanners and protocols. It probes robustness to domain shift by comparing in-distribution cross-validation performance against an out-of-distribution test set from unseen centers. Use when the user wants to benchmark on ODELIA Breast MRI Dataset, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports Macro AUC.
metadata:
skill_kind: dataset_eval
source_arxiv: 2506.00474
bibtex_key: mullerfranzes2025odelia
confidence: high
---
# odelia-breast-mri-eval
> A European Multi-Center Breast Cancer MRI Dataset — Müller-Franzes et al. (2025) (arXiv:2506.00474, 2025)
## What this evaluates
Evaluates a model's ability to classify breast MRI lesions into three clinical categories (no lesion, benign, malignant) using real-world, multi-center imaging data with high heterogeneity in scanners and protocols. It probes robustness to domain shift by comparing in-distribution cross-validation performance against an out-of-distribution test set from unseen centers.
## Datasets
- **ODELIA Breast MRI Dataset** — total 741; splits: test (-1), ood_test (-1); HF `ODELIA-AI/ODELIA-Challenge-2025`; repo https://github.com/mueller-franzes/odelia_breast_mri
## Metrics
- `Macro AUC` **(primary)** — range: percent
- Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, computed per class and averaged (macro). Values are reported as percentages.
- `Micro AUC` — range: percent
- Area under the ROC curve computed globally across all classes by pooling predictions.
- `Sensitivity at 90% Specificity` — range: percent
- True positive rate evaluated at a fixed true negative rate of 90%.
- `Specificity at 90% Sensitivity` — range: percent
- True negative rate evaluated at a fixed true positive rate of 90%.
## Input / output format
**Input**: Multi-parametric breast MRI scans (images) acquired from heterogeneous clinical scanners and protocols across six European institutions.
**Output**: Three-class classification: 'No Lesion', 'Benign Lesion', or 'Malignant Lesion'.
## Scoring recipe
```python
def compute_metrics(y_true, y_prob, n_classes=3):
# y_prob: shape (N, n_classes), y_true: shape (N,)
auc_macro = roc_auc_score(y_true, y_prob, average='macro', multi_class='ovr')
auc_micro = roc_auc_score(y_true, y_prob, average='micro', multi_class='ovr')
sens_at_90_spec = []
spec_at_90_sens = []
for c in range(n_classes):
fpr_c, tpr_c, _ = roc_curve(y_true == c, y_prob[:, c])
idx_spec = np.argmin(np.abs(fpr_c - 0.10))
sens_at_90_spec.append(tpr_c[idx_spec])
idx_sens = np.argmin(np.abs(tpr_c - 0.90))
spec_at_90_sens.append(1 - fpr_c[idx_sens])
return {
'macro_auc': np.mean(auc_macro) * 100,
'micro_auc': np.mean(auc_micro) * 100,
'sens_90_spec': np.mean(sens_at_90_spec) * 100,
'spec_90_sens': np.mean(spec_at_90_sens) * 100
}
```
## Common pitfalls
- Sensitivity and specificity are reported at fixed thresholds (90%) rather than at the optimal operating point, which differs from standard clinical reporting and requires careful threshold selection during evaluation.
- The OOD test set shows significantly degraded performance (e.g., Specificity drops to 26.7%), highlighting strong domain shift that must be explicitly accounted for when comparing models.
- Evaluation relies on 5-fold cross-validation for in-distribution data due to the small dataset size (n=741), making variance across folds a critical reporting metric.
## Evidence (verbatim from paper)
> A summary of the model's performance in classifying breast lesions is presented in Table 2. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and confusion matrix for the In-Distribution evaluation are shown in Figure 5, while those for the Out-of-Distribution test set are depicted in Figure 6. Table 2: Model's lesion classification performance. Macro AUC, Micro AUC, Sensitivity*, Specificity* ... *Sensitivity at 90% Specificity and vice versa. All values are expressed as a percentage.
## Citation
```bibtex
@misc{mullerfranzes2025odelia,
title={A European Multi-Center Breast Cancer MRI Dataset},
author={Müller-Franzes et al. (2025)},
year={2025},
note={arXiv:2506.00474}
}
```
- arXiv: 2506.00474
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!