Evaluates the ability of classifiers and LLMs to detect machine-generated news headlines across four languages. It probes cross-lingual generalization, robustness to zero-shot vs fine-tuned generators, and the effectiveness of linguistic vs transformer-based features for authenticity verification. Use when the user wants to benchmark on Multilingual Neural News Detection Benchmark, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports F1 score.
Scanned 9/11/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add qhjqhj00/research-skills-pool --skill neural-news-detection-eval --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Neural News Detection Eval?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/qhjqhj00-neural-news-detection-eval)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: neural-news-detection-eval
description: Evaluates the ability of classifiers and LLMs to detect machine-generated news headlines across four languages. It probes cross-lingual generalization, robustness to zero-shot vs fine-tuned generators, and the effectiveness of linguistic vs transformer-based features for authenticity verification. Use when the user wants to benchmark on Multilingual Neural News Detection Benchmark, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports F1 score.
metadata:
skill_kind: dataset_eval
source_arxiv: 2408.10724
bibtex_key: uyuk2024headlines
confidence: medium
---
# neural-news-detection-eval
> Crafting Tomorrow's Headlines: Neural News Generation and Detection in English, Turkish, Hungarian, and Persian — Cem Üyük et al. (arXiv:2408.10724, 2024)
## What this evaluates
Evaluates the ability of classifiers and LLMs to detect machine-generated news headlines across four languages. It probes cross-lingual generalization, robustness to zero-shot vs fine-tuned generators, and the effectiveness of linguistic vs transformer-based features for authenticity verification.
## Datasets
- **Multilingual Neural News Detection Benchmark** — total ?; splits: in-domain test (-1), out-of-domain test (-1)
## Metrics
- `F1 score` **(primary)** — range: [0, 1]
- Harmonic mean of precision and recall: 2 * (precision * recall) / (precision + recall).
## Input / output format
**Input**: A single news headline text in English, Turkish, Hungarian, or Persian.
**Output**: Binary classification label indicating whether the headline is human-written or machine-generated (LLM-generated).
## Scoring recipe
```python
def calculate_f1(predictions, gold):
tp = sum(1 for p, g in zip(predictions, gold) if p == 1 and g == 1)
fp = sum(1 for p, g in zip(predictions, gold) if p == 1 and g == 0)
fn = sum(1 for p, g in zip(predictions, gold) if p == 0 and g == 1)
precision = tp / (tp + fp) if (tp + fp) > 0 else 0
recall = tp / (tp + fn) if (tp + fn) > 0 else 0
return 2 * (precision * recall) / (precision + recall) if (precision + recall) > 0 else 0
```
## Common pitfalls
- Performance is heavily language-dependent; Persian shows artificially high scores likely due to shorter text lengths.
- Models fine-tuned on in-domain generators often fail to generalize to out-of-domain zero-shot generators.
- LLMs struggle to detect their own generated texts despite high performance on other models.
## Evidence (verbatim from paper)
> Notably, for GPT-4 in English, Random Forest once again achieves the highest F1 score.
## Citation
```bibtex
@misc{uyuk2024headlines,
title={Crafting Tomorrow's Headlines: Neural News Generation and Detection in English, Turkish, Hungarian, and Persian},
author={Cem Üyük et al.},
year={2024},
note={arXiv:2408.10724}
}
```
- arXiv: 2408.10724
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!