Evaluates pre-trained LLMs' networking operations (NetOps) knowledge and reasoning across five technical sub-domains and two languages. It probes both multiple-choice comprehension and open-ended generation capabilities in a domain-specific context. Use when the user wants to benchmark on NetEval, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports accuracy.
Scanned 9/11/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add qhjqhj00/research-skills-pool --skill netops-eval --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Netops Eval?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/qhjqhj00-netops-eval)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: netops-eval
description: Evaluates pre-trained LLMs' networking operations (NetOps) knowledge and reasoning across five technical sub-domains and two languages. It probes both multiple-choice comprehension and open-ended generation capabilities in a domain-specific context. Use when the user wants to benchmark on NetEval, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports accuracy.
metadata:
skill_kind: dataset_eval
source_arxiv: 2309.05557
bibtex_key: miao2023netops
confidence: high
---
# netops-eval
> An Empirical Study of NetOps Capability of Pre-Trained Large Language Models — Miao et al. (2023) (arXiv:2309.05557, 2023)
## What this evaluates
Evaluates pre-trained LLMs' networking operations (NetOps) knowledge and reasoning across five technical sub-domains and two languages. It probes both multiple-choice comprehension and open-ended generation capabilities in a domain-specific context.
## Datasets
- **NetEval** — total 5732; splits: development (5), validation (-1), test (-1)
## Metrics
- `accuracy` **(primary)** — range: [0, 1]
- The proportion of correctly answered questions out of the total evaluated. For multiple-choice questions, it is 1 if the predicted option matches the gold option, else 0. For open-ended questions, it relies on rule-based extraction and exact-match or string similarity against the gold answer.
## Input / output format
**Input**: Question text. For multiple-choice items, the four options (A-D) are provided. For open-ended items, only the question or fill-in-the-blank prompt is provided.
**Output**: For multiple-choice: a single letter (A, B, C, or D). For open-ended: a generated text string representing the answer or command.
## Scoring recipe
```python
correct = 0
total = 0
for pred, gold in zip(predictions, golds):
if gold_type == 'mcq':
if pred.strip().upper() == gold.strip().upper():
correct += 1
else:
if extract_and_normalize(pred) == extract_and_normalize(gold):
correct += 1
total += 1
return correct / total if total > 0 else 0.0
```
## Common pitfalls
- LLMs may guess on multiple-choice questions without possessing actual NetOps knowledge.
- Open-ended generation requires longer context/output, significantly increasing inference cost and latency.
- The full test set is not publicly released; users must submit requests to access evaluation results.
## Evidence (verbatim from paper)
> The collected evaluation set includes 5,269 multiple-choice questions. ... achieving a human-level accuracy in NetOps certification exam questions is still one of the fundamental capabilities we expect LLMs to have.
## Citation
```bibtex
@misc{miao2023netops,
title={An Empirical Study of NetOps Capability of Pre-Trained Large Language Models},
author={Miao et al. (2023)},
year={2023},
note={arXiv:2309.05557}
}
```
- arXiv: 2309.05557
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!