Evaluates encoder-based language models on core Nepali natural language understanding tasks, including named entity recognition, part-of-speech tagging, text classification, and categorical pair similarity. Use when the user wants to benchmark on Nep-gLUE, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports Nep-gLUE Score.
Scanned 9/11/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add qhjqhj00/research-skills-pool --skill nep-glu-eval --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Nep Glu Eval?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/qhjqhj00-nep-glu-eval)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: nep-glu-eval
description: Evaluates encoder-based language models on core Nepali natural language understanding tasks, including named entity recognition, part-of-speech tagging, text classification, and categorical pair similarity. Use when the user wants to benchmark on Nep-gLUE, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports Nep-gLUE Score.
metadata:
skill_kind: dataset_eval
source_arxiv: 2411.15734
bibtex_key: thapa2024development
confidence: high
---
# nep-glu-eval
> Development of Pre-Trained Transformer-based Models for the Nepali Language — Thapa et al. (2024) (arXiv:2411.15734, 2024)
## What this evaluates
Evaluates encoder-based language models on core Nepali natural language understanding tasks, including named entity recognition, part-of-speech tagging, text classification, and categorical pair similarity.
## Datasets
- **Nep-gLUE** — total ?; splits: test (-1)
## Metrics
- `Nep-gLUE Score` **(primary)** — range: percent
- Macro-average of task-specific accuracy scores across four subtasks: NER, POS tagging, text classification (CC), and categorical pair similarity (CPS).
## Input / output format
**Input**: Tokenized text sequences or sentence pairs for NLU tasks (NER, POS, classification, similarity).
**Output**: Task-specific predictions: entity labels, POS tags, class labels, or similarity scores.
## Scoring recipe
```python
def nep_glu_score(predictions, golds):
task_scores = []
for task in ['NER', 'POS', 'CC', 'CPS']:
task_scores.append(accuracy(predictions[task], golds[task]))
return sum(task_scores) / len(task_scores)
```
## Common pitfalls
- Hyperparameter tuning is task-specific (3-10 epochs, learning rates from 1e-5 to 5e-5); best model is selected per task on the test set, not via validation.
- The aggregate Nep-gLUE score masks per-task performance; a model can score high overall while underperforming on specific linguistic phenomena.
## Evidence (verbatim from paper)
> We used the Nepali Language Evaluation Benchmark, or Nep-gLUE Timilsina et al. ([2022]). It consists of four tasks, including Named Entity Recognition (NER), Part-of-Speech (POS) Tagging, text classification, and categorical pair similarity... Our models outperformed all existing models across all tasks, scoring 95.60 on Nep-gLUE Timilsina et al. ([2022]) benchmark
## Citation
```bibtex
@misc{thapa2024development,
title={Development of Pre-Trained Transformer-based Models for the Nepali Language},
author={Thapa et al. (2024)},
year={2024},
note={arXiv:2411.15734}
}
```
- arXiv: 2411.15734
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!