Evaluates English long-document retrieval on complex, narrative-style questions, probing deep comprehension and information extraction from lengthy texts. Use when the user wants to benchmark on NarrativeQA, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports nDCG@10.
Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Narrativeqa Eval?
Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/qhjqhj00-narrativeqa-eval)
---
name: narrativeqa-eval
description: Evaluates English long-document retrieval on complex, narrative-style questions, probing deep comprehension and information extraction from lengthy texts. Use when the user wants to benchmark on NarrativeQA, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports nDCG@10.
metadata:
skill_kind: dataset_eval
source_arxiv: 2402.03216
bibtex_key: [REDACTED]
confidence: high
---
# narrativeqa-eval
> M3-Embedding: Multi-Linguality, Multi-Functionality, Multi-Granularity Text Embeddings Through Self-Knowledge Distillation — Chen et al. (2024) (arXiv:2402.03216, 2024)
## What this evaluates
Evaluates English long-document retrieval on complex, narrative-style questions, probing deep comprehension and information extraction from lengthy texts.
## Datasets
- **NarrativeQA** — total ?; splits: test (-1)
## Metrics
- `nDCG@10` **(primary)** — range: [0, 1]
- Normalized Discounted Cumulative Gain at rank 10, assessing the ranking quality of retrieved narrative documents.
## Input / output format
**Input**: Complex questions and corresponding English narrative documents.
**Output**: A ranked list of retrieved documents.
## Scoring recipe
```python
def compute_ndcg_at_10(retrieved_ids, relevant_ids):
dcg = 0.0
for i, doc_id in enumerate(retrieved_ids[:10]):
if doc_id in relevant_ids:
dcg += 1.0 / math.log2(i + 2)
idcg = sum(1.0 / math.log2(i + 2) for i in range(min(len(relevant_ids), 10)))
return dcg / idcg if idcg > 0 else 0.0
```
## Common pitfalls
- Performance advantage over baselines grows with sequence length, indicating sensitivity to input context window.
- Only evaluates English documents, unlike the other benchmarks in the paper.
## Evidence (verbatim from paper)
> We make further analysis with NarrativeQA (Table[4]), where we can make a similar observation as MLDR. Besides, with the growth of sequence length, our method gradually expands its advantage over baseline methods (Figure [5]), which reflects its proficiency in handling long inputs. Table 4: Evaluation on NarrativeQA (nDCG@10).
## Citation
```bibtex
@misc{chen2024m3embedding,
title={M3-Embedding: Multi-Linguality, Multi-Functionality, Multi-Granularity Text Embeddings Through Self-Knowledge Distillation},
author={Chen et al. (2024)},
year={2024},
note={arXiv:2402.03216}
}
```
- arXiv: 2402.03216