This benchmark evaluates the zero-shot instance segmentation capability of models trained on synthetic data when applied to real-world agricultural scenes. It probes the model's ability to generalize across domain gaps, handling varying lighting, mushroom densities, and developmental stages without fine-tuning on real annotations. Use when the user wants to benchmark on Real-world on-field dataset, M18K, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports F1 score.
Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Mushroom Segmentation Eval?
Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/qhjqhj00-mushroom-segmentation-eval)
---
name: mushroom-segmentation-eval
description: This benchmark evaluates the zero-shot instance segmentation capability of models trained on synthetic data when applied to real-world agricultural scenes. It probes the model's ability to generalize across domain gaps, handling varying lighting, mushroom densities, and developmental stages without fine-tuning on real annotations. Use when the user wants to benchmark on Real-world on-field dataset, M18K, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports F1 score.
metadata:
skill_kind: dataset_eval
source_arxiv: 2512.08747
bibtex_key: [REDACTED]
confidence: high
---
# mushroom-segmentation-eval
> A Scalable Pipeline Combining Procedural 3D Graphics and Guided Diffusion for Photorealistic Synthetic Training Data Generation in White Button Mushroom Segmentation — Károly et al. (2025) (arXiv:2512.08747, 2025)
## What this evaluates
This benchmark evaluates the zero-shot instance segmentation capability of models trained on synthetic data when applied to real-world agricultural scenes. It probes the model's ability to generalize across domain gaps, handling varying lighting, mushroom densities, and developmental stages without fine-tuning on real annotations.
## Datasets
- **Real-world on-field dataset** — total 195; splits: test (195)
- **M18K** — total 20; splits: test (20)
## Metrics
- `F1 score` **(primary)** — range: [0, 1]
- Harmonic mean of precision and recall: 2 * (Precision * Recall) / (Precision + Recall). Used as the primary metric for model selection and comparison.
- `Average Precision (AP)` — range: [0, 1]
- Area under the precision-recall curve across multiple IoU thresholds or confidence thresholds, measuring detection accuracy.
- `Average Recall (AR)` — range: [0, 1]
- Area under the recall curve across multiple IoU thresholds or confidence thresholds, measuring the model's ability to find all ground-truth instances.
- `mean Intersection over Union (mIoU)` — range: [0, 1]
- Average IoU across all predicted and ground-truth instance masks: IoU = |Prediction ∩ Ground Truth| / |Prediction ∪ Ground Truth|.
- `Fréchet Inception Distance (FID)` — range: other
- Statistical distance between feature distributions of real and generated images using a pre-trained Inception network. Lower values indicate higher visual similarity.
- `Kernel Inception Distance (KID)` — range: other
- Squared maximum mean discrepancy between feature distributions of real and generated images using a polynomial kernel. Lower values indicate higher visual similarity.
## Input / output format
**Input**: RGB images of white button mushrooms at 512x512 or 1024x1024 resolution, captured in real-world agricultural settings or from the M18K dataset.
**Output**: Instance-level segmentation masks and bounding boxes for each detected mushroom, along with confidence scores.
## Scoring recipe
```python
def compute_metrics(predictions, ground_truth):
ious = compute_iou(predictions, ground_truth)
tp = count_true_positives(ious)
fp = len(predictions) - tp
fn = len(ground_truth) - tp
precision = tp / (tp + fp) if (tp + fp) > 0 else 0
recall = tp / (tp + fn) if (tp + fn) > 0 else 0
f1 = 2 * precision * recall / (precision + recall) if (precision + recall) > 0 else 0
ap = average_precision_curve(predictions, ground_truth)
ar = average_recall_curve(predictions, ground_truth)
miou = mean(ious)
return {'F1': f1, 'AP': ap, 'AR': ar, 'mIoU': miou}
```
## Common pitfalls
- Incomplete labeling in the M18K test set causes correctly detected mushrooms to be counted as false positives, artificially lowering AP.
- FID and KID scores measure visual similarity but do not reliably correlate with downstream segmentation performance or human preference.
- Models trained on synthetic data may exhibit conservative detection behavior, favoring precision over recall on datasets with many small or ambiguous objects.
## Evidence (verbatim from paper)
> For model comparison, we report standard instance segmentation metrics: Average Precision (AP), Average Recall (AR), F1 score, and mean Intersection over Union (mIoU). The results of the first experiment, comparing the MRCNN-B and MRCNN-SD models on our real-world dataset, are presented in Table [1].
## Citation
```bibtex
@misc{karoly2025mushroomsegmentation,
title={A Scalable Pipeline Combining Procedural 3D Graphics and Guided Diffusion for Photorealistic Synthetic Training Data Generation in White Button Mushroom Segmentation},
author={Károly et al. (2025)},
year={2025},
note={arXiv:2512.08747}
}
```
- arXiv: 2512.08747