Skip to content
Back to skills

Multiwoz Dst Eval

ASecurity

Evaluates a model's ability to track and predict dialogue states across multiple domains in a conversation. It measures how accurately the system maintains slot-value pairs as the user's goals evolve and switches between domains like restaurant, hotel, and taxi. Use when the user wants to benchmark on MultiWOZ, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports Joint Goal Accuracy (JGA).

  • 3 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 1 view
  • Added September 11, 2026
researchpythongo

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned September 11, 2026

npx -y skills add qhjqhj00/research-skills-pool --skill multiwoz-dst-eval --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Multiwoz Dst Eval?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Multiwoz Dst Eval
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/qhjqhj00-multiwoz-dst-eval/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/qhjqhj00-multiwoz-dst-eval)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: multiwoz-dst-eval
description: Evaluates a model's ability to track and predict dialogue states across multiple domains in a conversation. It measures how accurately the system maintains slot-value pairs as the user's goals evolve and switches between domains like restaurant, hotel, and taxi. Use when the user wants to benchmark on MultiWOZ, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports Joint Goal Accuracy (JGA).
metadata:
  skill_kind: dataset_eval
  source_arxiv: 2603.10367
  bibtex_key: su2026dynamic
  confidence: high
---

# multiwoz-dst-eval

> Dynamic Knowledge Fusion for Multi-Domain Dialogue State Tracking — Su et al. (2026) (arXiv:2603.10367, 2026)

## What this evaluates

Evaluates a model's ability to track and predict dialogue states across multiple domains in a conversation. It measures how accurately the system maintains slot-value pairs as the user's goals evolve and switches between domains like restaurant, hotel, and taxi.

## Datasets

- **MultiWOZ** — total 10000; splits: train|val|test (-1)

## Metrics

- `Joint Goal Accuracy (JGA)` **(primary)** — range: [0, 1]
  - Proportion of dialogue turns where the predicted set of slot-value pairs exactly matches the ground truth set for that turn.
- `Slot Accuracy (SA)` — range: [0, 1]
  - Average accuracy across all slots in the ontology: SA = (Σ acc_i) / n, where n is the total number of ontology slots and acc_i is 1 if the predicted value matches the ground truth, else 0.

## Input / output format

**Input**: Dialogue history (user and system utterances) up to the current turn, plus domain schema and ontology knowledge provided as contextual prompts.

**Output**: A set of slot-value pairs representing the predicted dialogue state for the current turn.

## Scoring recipe

```python
def compute_metrics(pred_states, gold_states, ontology):
    jga_correct = 0
    total_slots = len(ontology)
    total_slot_correct = 0
    for pred, gold in zip(pred_states, gold_states):
        if pred == gold:
            jga_correct += 1
        for slot in ontology:
            if pred.get(slot) == gold.get(slot):
                total_slot_correct += 1
    jga = jga_correct / len(pred_states)
    sa = total_slot_correct / (len(pred_states) * total_slots)
    return {'JGA': jga, 'SA': sa}
```

## Common pitfalls

- JGA requires exact set matching of all slot-value pairs for a turn; partial matches do not count.
- Slot Accuracy is computed over the entire ontology size (n), not just the slots mentioned in the dialogue, which can dilute the score if many slots are irrelevant.
- Different MultiWOZ versions (2.1 vs 2.4) have significantly different annotation qualities and evaluation sets, making cross-version comparisons invalid without careful normalization.

## Evidence (verbatim from paper)

> Joint Goal Accuracy (JGA) quantifies the proportion of dialogue turns in which the model’s predicted dialogue state is an exact match to the label dialogue state, thus serving as a rigorous measure of full-state prediction accuracy. ... Slot Accuracy (SA) evaluates the correctness of the model’s predictions at the individual slot level for each dialogue turn. It is computed as the proportion of slot values that are predicted correctly, and is defined as: SA = \frac{\sum_{i}^{n}acc_{i}}{n}, where, n denotes the number of slots in the ontology.

## Citation

```bibtex
@misc{su2026dynamic,
  title={Dynamic Knowledge Fusion for Multi-Domain Dialogue State Tracking},
  author={Su et al. (2026)},
  year={2026},
  note={arXiv:2603.10367}
}
```

- arXiv: 2603.10367

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.