Evaluates fine-grained and coarse-grained cross-modal retrieval capabilities across text, image, and video modalities. It probes a model's ability to align and retrieve relevant visual or textual content given a query from a different modality, including instruction-based queries. Use when the user wants to benchmark on CaReBench, ShareGPT4V, Urban1K, DOCCI, WebVid-CoVR, MMEB, Flickr30K, MSR-VTT, MSVD, DiDeMo, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports Recall@1.
Scanned 9/11/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add qhjqhj00/research-skills-pool --skill multimodal-retrieval-eval --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Multimodal Retrieval Eval?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/qhjqhj00-multimodal-retrieval-eval)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: multimodal-retrieval-eval
description: Evaluates fine-grained and coarse-grained cross-modal retrieval capabilities across text, image, and video modalities. It probes a model's ability to align and retrieve relevant visual or textual content given a query from a different modality, including instruction-based queries. Use when the user wants to benchmark on CaReBench, ShareGPT4V, Urban1K, DOCCI, WebVid-CoVR, MMEB, Flickr30K, MSR-VTT, MSVD, DiDeMo, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports Recall@1.
metadata:
skill_kind: dataset_eval
source_arxiv: 2505.19650
bibtex_key: kong2025modality
confidence: high
---
# multimodal-retrieval-eval
> Modality Curation: Building Universal Embeddings for Advanced Multimodal Information Retrieval — Kong et al. (2025) (arXiv:2505.19650, 2025)
## What this evaluates
Evaluates fine-grained and coarse-grained cross-modal retrieval capabilities across text, image, and video modalities. It probes a model's ability to align and retrieve relevant visual or textual content given a query from a different modality, including instruction-based queries.
## Datasets
- **CaReBench** — total ?; splits: test (-1)
- **ShareGPT4V** — total ?; splits: test (-1)
- **Urban1K** — total ?; splits: test (-1)
- **DOCCI** — total ?; splits: test (-1)
- **WebVid-CoVR** — total ?; splits: test (-1)
- **MMEB** — total ?; splits: test (-1)
- **Flickr30K** — total ?; splits: test (-1)
- **MSR-VTT** — total ?; splits: test (-1)
- **MSVD** — total ?; splits: test (-1)
- **DiDeMo** — total ?; splits: test (-1)
## Metrics
- `Recall@1` **(primary)** — range: percent
- The fraction of queries for which the ground-truth matching item appears in the top-1 retrieved result.
- `Recall@5` — range: percent
- The fraction of queries for which the ground-truth matching item appears in the top-5 retrieved results.
- `Recall@10` — range: percent
- The fraction of queries for which the ground-truth matching item appears in the top-10 retrieved results.
- `Recall@50` — range: percent
- The fraction of queries for which the ground-truth matching item appears in the top-50 retrieved results.
- `Average Score` — range: percent
- The arithmetic mean of in-distribution (IND) and out-of-distribution (OOD) scores across meta-tasks on the MMEB benchmark.
## Input / output format
**Input**: Text queries paired with candidate images or videos, or visual queries paired with candidate text descriptions.
**Output**: A ranked list of retrieved candidates or similarity scores for each query-candidate pair.
## Scoring recipe
```python
def recall_at_k(retrieved_indices, gold_index, k):
top_k = retrieved_indices[:k]
return 1.0 if gold_index in top_k else 0.0
# Average across all queries in the test set
```
## Common pitfalls
- Confusing text-to-visual (T→V) versus visual-to-text (V→T) retrieval directions, which often show asymmetric performance.
- Failing to distinguish between fine-grained (e.g., CaReBench) and coarse-grained (e.g., MSR-VTT) tasks, as fine-grained benchmarks demand significantly higher precision.
- Reporting only R@1 when the protocol explicitly notes that R@5, R@10, and R@50 are also standard for robustness evaluation.
## Evidence (verbatim from paper)
> All experimental results are reported in Recall@1 unless otherwise specified.
## Citation
```bibtex
@misc{kong2025modality,
title={Modality Curation: Building Universal Embeddings for Advanced Multimodal Information Retrieval},
author={Kong et al. (2025)},
year={2025},
note={arXiv:2505.19650}
}
```
- arXiv: 2505.19650
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!