Evaluates fine-grained and coarse-grained cross-modal retrieval capabilities across text, image, and video modalities. It probes a model's ability to align and retrieve relevant visual or textual content given a query from a different modality, including instruction-based queries. Use when the user wants to benchmark on CaReBench, ShareGPT4V, Urban1K, DOCCI, WebVid-CoVR, MMEB, Flickr30K, MSR-VTT, MSVD, DiDeMo, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports Recall@1.
Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Multimodal Retrieval Eval?
Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/qhjqhj00-multimodal-retrieval-eval)
---
name: multimodal-retrieval-eval
description: Evaluates fine-grained and coarse-grained cross-modal retrieval capabilities across text, image, and video modalities. It probes a model's ability to align and retrieve relevant visual or textual content given a query from a different modality, including instruction-based queries. Use when the user wants to benchmark on CaReBench, ShareGPT4V, Urban1K, DOCCI, WebVid-CoVR, MMEB, Flickr30K, MSR-VTT, MSVD, DiDeMo, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports Recall@1.
metadata:
skill_kind: dataset_eval
source_arxiv: 2505.19650
bibtex_key: [REDACTED]
confidence: high
---
# multimodal-retrieval-eval
> Modality Curation: Building Universal Embeddings for Advanced Multimodal Information Retrieval — Kong et al. (2025) (arXiv:2505.19650, 2025)
## What this evaluates
Evaluates fine-grained and coarse-grained cross-modal retrieval capabilities across text, image, and video modalities. It probes a model's ability to align and retrieve relevant visual or textual content given a query from a different modality, including instruction-based queries.
## Datasets
- **CaReBench** — total ?; splits: test (-1)
- **ShareGPT4V** — total ?; splits: test (-1)
- **Urban1K** — total ?; splits: test (-1)
- **DOCCI** — total ?; splits: test (-1)
- **WebVid-CoVR** — total ?; splits: test (-1)
- **MMEB** — total ?; splits: test (-1)
- **Flickr30K** — total ?; splits: test (-1)
- **MSR-VTT** — total ?; splits: test (-1)
- **MSVD** — total ?; splits: test (-1)
- **DiDeMo** — total ?; splits: test (-1)
## Metrics
- `Recall@1` **(primary)** — range: percent
- The fraction of queries for which the ground-truth matching item appears in the top-1 retrieved result.
- `Recall@5` — range: percent
- The fraction of queries for which the ground-truth matching item appears in the top-5 retrieved results.
- `Recall@10` — range: percent
- The fraction of queries for which the ground-truth matching item appears in the top-10 retrieved results.
- `Recall@50` — range: percent
- The fraction of queries for which the ground-truth matching item appears in the top-50 retrieved results.
- `Average Score` — range: percent
- The arithmetic mean of in-distribution (IND) and out-of-distribution (OOD) scores across meta-tasks on the MMEB benchmark.
## Input / output format
**Input**: Text queries paired with candidate images or videos, or visual queries paired with candidate text descriptions.
**Output**: A ranked list of retrieved candidates or similarity scores for each query-candidate pair.
## Scoring recipe
```python
def recall_at_k(retrieved_indices, gold_index, k):
top_k = retrieved_indices[:k]
return 1.0 if gold_index in top_k else 0.0
# Average across all queries in the test set
```
## Common pitfalls
- Confusing text-to-visual (T→V) versus visual-to-text (V→T) retrieval directions, which often show asymmetric performance.
- Failing to distinguish between fine-grained (e.g., CaReBench) and coarse-grained (e.g., MSR-VTT) tasks, as fine-grained benchmarks demand significantly higher precision.
- Reporting only R@1 when the protocol explicitly notes that R@5, R@10, and R@50 are also standard for robustness evaluation.
## Evidence (verbatim from paper)
> All experimental results are reported in Recall@1 unless otherwise specified.
## Citation
```bibtex
@misc{kong2025modality,
title={Modality Curation: Building Universal Embeddings for Advanced Multimodal Information Retrieval},
author={Kong et al. (2025)},
year={2025},
note={arXiv:2505.19650}
}
```
- arXiv: 2505.19650