Skip to content
Back to skills

Multi Disease Cxr Eval

ASecurity

Evaluates the cross-institutional generalizability of deep learning models for multi-disease chest X-ray classification. It probes whether training on diverse, weakly-labeled radiology datasets improves prediction performance for specific pathologies when tested on held-out medical sites. Use when the user wants to benchmark on NIH, CheXpert, Shifa International Hospital (SIH), or asks about evaluating this task. Reports AUC.

  • 3 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 2 views
  • Added September 11, 2026
researchpythontestingperformance

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned September 11, 2026

npx -y skills add qhjqhj00/research-skills-pool --skill multi-disease-cxr-eval --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Multi Disease Cxr Eval?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Multi Disease Cxr Eval
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/qhjqhj00-multi-disease-cxr-eval/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/qhjqhj00-multi-disease-cxr-eval)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: multi-disease-cxr-eval
description: Evaluates the cross-institutional generalizability of deep learning models for multi-disease chest X-ray classification. It probes whether training on diverse, weakly-labeled radiology datasets improves prediction performance for specific pathologies when tested on held-out medical sites. Use when the user wants to benchmark on NIH, CheXpert, Shifa International Hospital (SIH), or asks about evaluating this task. Reports AUC.
metadata:
  skill_kind: dataset_eval
  source_arxiv: 2010.12065
  bibtex_key: [REDACTED]
  confidence: high
---

# multi-disease-cxr-eval

> A generalized deep learning model for multi-disease Chest X-Ray diagnostics — Bajwa et al. (2020) (arXiv:2010.12065, 2020)

## What this evaluates

Evaluates the cross-institutional generalizability of deep learning models for multi-disease chest X-ray classification. It probes whether training on diverse, weakly-labeled radiology datasets improves prediction performance for specific pathologies when tested on held-out medical sites.

## Datasets

- **NIH** — total ?; splits: test (-1)
- **CheXpert** — total ?; splits: val (-1), test (-1)
- **Shifa International Hospital (SIH)** — total ?; splits: test (-1)

## Metrics

- `AUC` **(primary)** — range: [0, 1]
  - Area under the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve. Computed independently for each of the four disease classes (Atelectasis, Cardiomegaly, Pleural Effusion, Pneumonia) and averaged across classes to report overall performance.

## Input / output format

**Input**: Chest X-ray radiographic images.

**Output**: Binary classification scores/probabilities for four disease classes: Atelectasis, Cardiomegaly, Pleural Effusion, and Pneumonia.

## Scoring recipe

```python
def compute_auc(preds, labels):
    fpr, tpr, _ = roc_curve(labels, preds)
    return auc(fpr, tpr)

aucs = []
for disease in ['Atelectasis', 'Cardiomegaly', 'Pleural Effusion', 'Pneumonia']:
    aucs.append(compute_auc(model_predictions[disease], ground_truth[disease]))
average_auc = mean(aucs)
std_auc = std(aucs)
# Statistical significance assessed via t-test and Wilcoxon signed-rank test
```

## Common pitfalls

- The CheXpert validation set contains only nine pneumonia-positive cases, making AUC scores on that specific split statistically unreliable.
- The reported 'average AUC' is a simple arithmetic mean of per-class AUCs, not a macro-averaged AUC computed over all samples jointly.
- Models are evaluated on cross-site generalization by training on one or two sites and testing on held-out sites, but label noise from weak supervision is not corrected during evaluation.

## Evidence (verbatim from paper)

> We first discuss the overall performance, calculated as the average AUC over all four diseases. This is followed by a detailed performance evaluation and discussion of the models on each disease class. Table 6 demonstrates the average AUC scores of the models on the three datasets.

## Citation

```bibtex
@misc{bajwa2020generalized,
  title={A generalized deep learning model for multi-disease Chest X-Ray diagnostics},
  author={Bajwa et al. (2020)},
  year={2020},
  note={arXiv:2010.12065}
}
```

- arXiv: 2010.12065

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.