Skip to content
Back to skills

Multi Anatomy Xray Eval

ASecurity

Evaluates the generalization and task-specific performance of a multi-anatomy X-ray foundation model across diverse downstream tasks including image retrieval, disease classification, anatomical segmentation, lesion localization, and clinical report generation. Use when the user wants to benchmark on CheXpert, dXR, PTX / SIIM-ACR, MURA, JSRT, VinDr-RibCXR, PAX-Ray++, MS-CXR, IU-XRay, Bone Fracture Detection, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports AUROC.

  • 3 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 1 view
  • Added September 11, 2026
researchpythongoperformance

Works with

  • cli

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned September 11, 2026

npx -y skills add qhjqhj00/research-skills-pool --skill multi-anatomy-xray-eval --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Multi Anatomy Xray Eval?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Multi Anatomy Xray Eval
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/qhjqhj00-multi-anatomy-xray-eval/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/qhjqhj00-multi-anatomy-xray-eval)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: multi-anatomy-xray-eval
description: Evaluates the generalization and task-specific performance of a multi-anatomy X-ray foundation model across diverse downstream tasks including image retrieval, disease classification, anatomical segmentation, lesion localization, and clinical report generation. Use when the user wants to benchmark on CheXpert, dXR, PTX / SIIM-ACR, MURA, JSRT, VinDr-RibCXR, PAX-Ray++, MS-CXR, IU-XRay, Bone Fracture Detection, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports AUROC.
metadata:
  skill_kind: dataset_eval
  source_arxiv: 2509.12146
  bibtex_key: singla2025multi
  confidence: high
---

# multi-anatomy-xray-eval

> Multi Anatomy X-Ray Foundation Model — Singla et al. (2025) (arXiv:2509.12146, 2025)

## What this evaluates

Evaluates the generalization and task-specific performance of a multi-anatomy X-ray foundation model across diverse downstream tasks including image retrieval, disease classification, anatomical segmentation, lesion localization, and clinical report generation.

## Datasets

- **CheXpert** — total ?; splits: test (-1)
- **dXR** — total ?; splits: test (-1)
- **PTX / SIIM-ACR** — total ?; splits: test (-1)
- **MURA** — total ?; splits: test (-1)
- **JSRT** — total ?; splits: test (-1)
- **VinDr-RibCXR** — total ?; splits: test (-1)
- **PAX-Ray++** — total ?; splits: test (-1)
- **MS-CXR** — total ?; splits: test (-1)
- **IU-XRay** — total ?; splits: test (-1)
- **Bone Fracture Detection** — total ?; splits: test (-1)

## Metrics

- `AUROC` **(primary)** — range: [0, 1]
  - Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic curve. Measures the probability that a randomly chosen positive instance is ranked higher than a randomly chosen negative instance across all classification thresholds.
- `DSC` — range: [0, 1]
  - Dice Similarity Coefficient. Computed as 2 * |A ∩ B| / (|A| + |B|), where A and B are the predicted and ground truth segmentation masks. Measures spatial overlap between masks.
- `mIoU` — range: [0, 1]
  - Mean Intersection over Union. Average of IoU scores across all classes or instances. IoU = |A ∩ B| / |A ∪ B|.
- `P@k` — range: [0, 1]
  - Precision at k. Fraction of relevant images among the top-k retrieved results. P@k = |relevant ∩ top_k| / k.
- `BLEU-1 to BLEU-4, ROUGE-L, CIDEr` — range: percent
  - Standard NLP metrics for text generation. BLEU measures n-gram precision with brevity penalty. ROUGE-L uses longest common subsequence. CIDEr uses TF-IDF weighted n-gram similarity against reference reports.

## Input / output format

**Input**: Single X-ray radiograph image (typically 518×518, 1022×1022, or 1540×1540 pixels). For supervised evaluation, task-specific annotations are provided: class labels (classification), pixel-wise masks (segmentation), bounding boxes/keypoints (localization), or paired clinical reports (generation).

**Output**: Task-dependent: ranked list of retrieved images (retrieval), class probabilities or discrete labels (classification), binary/semantic segmentation masks (segmentation), bounding box coordinates or keypoint heatmaps (localization), or free-text clinical radiology reports (generation).

## Scoring recipe

```python
def compute_metrics(predictions, gold, task):
    if task == 'classification':
        return roc_auc_score(gold, predictions)
    elif task == 'segmentation':
        intersection = np.logical_and(predictions, gold).sum()
        union = np.logical_or(predictions, gold).sum()
        return 2 * intersection / (union + 1e-6)
    elif task == 'retrieval':
        k = 5
        relevant = [i for i, p in enumerate(predictions) if p in gold]
        return len([r for r in relevant if r < k]) / k
    elif task == 'localization':
        # mIoU or mAP@50 computed via standard detection/grounding eval
        return compute_mIoU(predictions, gold)
    elif task == 'generation':
        return compute_nlp_metrics(predictions, gold) # BLEU/ROUGE/CIDEr
    return None
```

## Common pitfalls

- Using the [CLS] token for classification yields suboptimal performance for tasks requiring spatial features (e.g., lead markers); patch embeddings should be used instead.
- Decoder complexity matters: simple linear decoders work well for scratch-trained models, while complex decoders like UPerNet require warm-start initialization or larger pretraining data to avoid underperformance.
- Evaluation is highly resolution-dependent; increasing input size from 518 to 1540 pixels significantly boosts detection of subtle pathologies like pneumothorax, but requires reduced batch sizes to fit GPU memory.

## Evidence (verbatim from paper)

> We benchmark model performance on public and internal datasets, including CheXpert, PTX, MURA and QC. ... Notably, CXR-0 achieves the highest AUROC on CheXpert with full data (85.3), while RadDINO leads on PTX (81.8).

## Citation

```bibtex
@misc{singla2025multi,
  title={Multi Anatomy X-Ray Foundation Model},
  author={Singla et al. (2025)},
  year={2025},
  note={arXiv:2509.12146}
}
```

- arXiv: 2509.12146

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.