Skip to content
Back to skills

Moving Object Segmentation Eval

ASecurity

Evaluates a model's ability to generate and rank spatio-temporal proposals for moving objects in video. It probes motion-based segmentation quality, proposal coverage, and ranking accuracy on both rigid and non-rigid motion across diverse scenes. Use when the user wants to benchmark on VSB100, Moseg, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports Average best overlap, Coverage.

  • 3 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 3 views
  • Added September 11, 2026
researchpython

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned September 11, 2026

npx -y skills add qhjqhj00/research-skills-pool --skill moving-object-segmentation-eval --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Moving Object Segmentation Eval?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Moving Object Segmentation Eval
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/qhjqhj00-moving-object-segmentation-eval/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/qhjqhj00-moving-object-segmentation-eval)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: moving-object-segmentation-eval
description: Evaluates a model's ability to generate and rank spatio-temporal proposals for moving objects in video. It probes motion-based segmentation quality, proposal coverage, and ranking accuracy on both rigid and non-rigid motion across diverse scenes. Use when the user wants to benchmark on VSB100, Moseg, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports Average best overlap, Coverage.
metadata:
  skill_kind: dataset_eval
  source_arxiv: 1412.6504
  bibtex_key: [REDACTED]
  confidence: high
---

# moving-object-segmentation-eval

> Learning to Segment Moving Objects in Videos — Fragkiadaki et al. (2014) (arXiv:1412.6504, 2014)

## What this evaluates

Evaluates a model's ability to generate and rank spatio-temporal proposals for moving objects in video. It probes motion-based segmentation quality, proposal coverage, and ranking accuracy on both rigid and non-rigid motion across diverse scenes.

## Datasets

- **VSB100** — total 100; splits: train (40), test (60)
- **Moseg** — total 59; splits: test (59)

## Metrics

- `Average best overlap` **(primary)** — range: [0, 1]
  - For each ground-truth segment, compute the maximum IoU across all proposals. Average these maximum IoU values across all ground-truth segments.
- `Coverage` **(primary)** — range: [0, 1]
  - Weighted average of IoU scores, where weights correspond to the area of each ground-truth segment. Larger segments contribute more to the score.
- `Detection rate at 50%` — range: percent
  - Percentage of ground-truth segments that achieve a maximum IoU above 0.5 with any proposal.
- `Detection rate at 70%` — range: percent
  - Percentage of ground-truth segments that achieve a maximum IoU above 0.7 with any proposal.
- `Anytime best overlap/detection` — range: [0, 1] | percent
  - Variant of the above metrics where, instead of evaluating per-frame segments, the best overlap/detection is computed across the entire lifespan of each ground-truth tube.

## Input / output format

**Input**: RGB video frames, optical flow fields, and static image segment proposals.

**Output**: Spatio-temporal tubes or per-frame segment proposals, each associated with a bounding box and a moving objectness score.

## Scoring recipe

```python
def compute_metrics(proposals, gt_segments):
    ious = {g: max(iou(p, g) for p in proposals) for g in gt_segments}
    avg_best_overlap = mean(ious.values())
    coverage = sum(ious[g] * area(g) for g in gt_segments) / sum(area(g) for g in gt_segments)
    det_50 = mean(v > 0.5 for v in ious.values())
    det_70 = mean(v > 0.7 for v in ious.values())
    return avg_best_overlap, coverage, det_50, det_70
# For 'anytime best' metrics, replace per-frame segments with spatio-temporal tubes and evaluate across the full lifespan.
```

## Common pitfalls

- Confusing per-frame IoU with spatio-temporal tube IoU, as the paper evaluates both separately and notes different failure modes (e.g., temporal fragmentation vs. background leakage).
- Using mean IoU instead of 'best overlap' or 'coverage', which specifically require taking the maximum IoU per ground-truth object or weighting by ground-truth area.
- Overlooking the 'anytime best' metric, which evaluates proposal quality across an object's entire lifespan rather than frame-by-frame.

## Evidence (verbatim from paper)

> We consider the following four widely used static image segmentation metrics: a) Average best overlap: the average (across all 2D ground-truth segments in our dataset) of the best IoU score of a ground-truth object with all segment proposals. b) Coverage: the weighted average of IoU scores, weighted by the area of the ground-truth segments (larger segments matter more). c) Detection rate at 50%:the percentage of ground-truth segments that have IoU above 50% with a segment proposal. d) Detection rate at 70%.

## Citation

```bibtex
@misc{fragkiadaki2014learning,
  title={Learning to Segment Moving Objects in Videos},
  author={Fragkiadaki et al. (2014)},
  year={2014},
  note={arXiv:1412.6504}
}
```

- arXiv: 1412.6504

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.