Evaluates the performance and parameter/memory/throughput efficiency of a gradient-free MoE-style PEFT routing mechanism across text, image, and video benchmarks compared to standard and MoE-PEFT baselines. Use when the user wants to benchmark on 47 Benchmarks (Text/Image/Video), or asks about evaluating this task. Reports accuracy.
Scanned 9/11/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add qhjqhj00/research-skills-pool --skill monkey-jump-eval --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Monkey Jump Eval?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/qhjqhj00-monkey-jump-eval)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: monkey-jump-eval
description: Evaluates the performance and parameter/memory/throughput efficiency of a gradient-free MoE-style PEFT routing mechanism across text, image, and video benchmarks compared to standard and MoE-PEFT baselines. Use when the user wants to benchmark on 47 Benchmarks (Text/Image/Video), or asks about evaluating this task. Reports accuracy.
metadata:
skill_kind: dataset_eval
source_arxiv: 2601.06356
bibtex_key: prottasha2026monkeyjump
confidence: high
---
# monkey-jump-eval
> Monkey Jump : MoE-Style PEFT for Efficient Multi-Task Learning — Prottasha et al. (2026) (arXiv:2601.06356, 2026)
## What this evaluates
Evaluates the performance and parameter/memory/throughput efficiency of a gradient-free MoE-style PEFT routing mechanism across text, image, and video benchmarks compared to standard and MoE-PEFT baselines.
## Datasets
- **47 Benchmarks (Text/Image/Video)** — total 153000; splits: test (-1)
## Metrics
- `accuracy` **(primary)** — range: percent
- Percentage of correctly predicted labels or tokens compared to ground truth. Reported as mean ± standard deviation over 5 independent runs.
- `throughput` — range: it/s
- Number of iterations processed per second during training or inference.
- `peak_gpu_memory` — range: GB
- Maximum GPU memory allocated during forward/backward passes.
## Input / output format
**Input**: Text prompts (Llama-3-8B-Instruct), images, or video frames (LLaVA-OneVision-Qwen2-7B) depending on modality.
**Output**: Class labels or generated text responses.
## Scoring recipe
```python
def compute_accuracy(predictions, gold_labels):
correct = sum(1 for p, g in zip(predictions, gold_labels) if p == g)
return (correct / len(gold_labels)) * 100
def compute_efficiency(model, dataloader, device):
params = sum(p.numel() for p in model.parameters() if p.requires_grad)
peak_mem = torch.cuda.max_memory_allocated(device) / 1e9
start = time.time()
for batch in dataloader:
model(batch)
throughput = len(dataloader) / (time.time() - start)
return params, peak_mem, throughput
```
## Common pitfalls
- Results are averaged over 5 runs with standard deviation reported; single-run scores may vary significantly.
- Efficiency metrics (memory, throughput) are hardware-specific (H100 GPU) and may not generalize to other architectures.
- MJ variants reuse existing adapters rather than adding new experts, so total model size remains nearly identical to baselines despite different routing.
## Evidence (verbatim from paper)
> On CS&QA, MJLoRAFA achieves the highest accuracy (66.16%), outperforming MoRE (66.09%) and MixLoRA (66.03%). ... MJ achieves 1.5–2× faster training. MJ-Propulsion reaches 5.94 it/s throughput and completes training in 5.0 minutes, compared to 3.02–3.83 it/s and 7.7–9.4 minutes for MoE-PEFT methods.
## Citation
```bibtex
@misc{prottasha2026monkeyjump,
title={Monkey Jump : MoE-Style PEFT for Efficient Multi-Task Learning},
author={Prottasha et al. (2026)},
year={2026},
note={arXiv:2601.06356}
}
```
- arXiv: 2601.06356
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!