Evaluates multilingual and cross-lingual text embedding capabilities across 131 tasks spanning 250+ languages. Probes performance on diverse NLP tasks including retrieval, classification, clustering, and semantic textual similarity using instruction-tuned embeddings. Use when the user wants to benchmark on MTEB Multilingual (MMTEB), or asks about evaluating this task. Reports Borda count.
Scanned 9/11/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add qhjqhj00/research-skills-pool --skill mmteb-multilingual-eval --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Mmteb Multilingual Eval?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/qhjqhj00-mmteb-multilingual-eval)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: mmteb-multilingual-eval
description: Evaluates multilingual and cross-lingual text embedding capabilities across 131 tasks spanning 250+ languages. Probes performance on diverse NLP tasks including retrieval, classification, clustering, and semantic textual similarity using instruction-tuned embeddings. Use when the user wants to benchmark on MTEB Multilingual (MMTEB), or asks about evaluating this task. Reports Borda count.
metadata:
skill_kind: dataset_eval
source_arxiv: 2511.07025
bibtex_key: babakhin2025llamaembednemotron8b
confidence: high
---
# mmteb-multilingual-eval
> Llama-Embed-Nemotron-8B: A Universal Text Embedding Model for Multilingual and Cross-Lingual Tasks — Babakhin et al. (2025) (arXiv:2511.07025, 2025)
## What this evaluates
Evaluates multilingual and cross-lingual text embedding capabilities across 131 tasks spanning 250+ languages. Probes performance on diverse NLP tasks including retrieval, classification, clustering, and semantic textual similarity using instruction-tuned embeddings.
## Datasets
- **MTEB Multilingual (MMTEB)** — total ?; splits: test (-1)
## Metrics
- `Borda count` **(primary)** — range: other
- Each of the 131 tasks acts as a voter, assigning points to models based on their relative performance rank on that task. The model with the highest total points across all tasks achieves the top rank, rewarding broad and consistent generalization.
- `Mean(Task)` — range: percent
- The arithmetic average of the performance scores across all 131 individual tasks.
- `Mean(Type)` — range: percent
- The arithmetic average of the performance scores across the 9 problem types.
## Input / output format
**Input**: Text pairs (query/document) accompanied by task-specific instructions or templates.
**Output**: Fixed-dimensional embedding vectors for each text instance.
## Scoring recipe
```python
def compute_borda_count(task_scores):
votes = {model: 0 for model in task_scores}
for task, scores in task_scores.items():
ranked = sorted(scores.items(), key=lambda x: x[1], reverse=True)
for rank, (model, _) in enumerate(ranked):
votes[model] += len(ranked) - rank
return votes
```
## Common pitfalls
- Relying solely on Mean(Task) score, which can be inflated by strong performance on a small subset of benchmarks rather than indicating consistent generalization.
- Ignoring task-specific instruction templates, which are critical for instruction-aware embedding models to perform optimally on MTEB tasks.
## Evidence (verbatim from paper)
> Ranking on the official MMTEB Leaderboard is determined by the Borda count method. Each task is treated as a preference voter, which gives votes to the models based on their relative performance on the task. The best model obtains the highest number of votes. The model with the highest number of votes across all tasks obtains the highest rank.
## Citation
```bibtex
@misc{babakhin2025llamaembednemotron8b,
title={Llama-Embed-Nemotron-8B: A Universal Text Embedding Model for Multilingual and Cross-Lingual Tasks},
author={Babakhin et al. (2025)},
year={2025},
note={arXiv:2511.07025}
}
```
- arXiv: 2511.07025
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!