Evaluates multi-modal and agent models across any-to-any generation and action-planning tasks using real-world data mixtures. It probes capabilities in vision-language understanding, audio-language understanding, text-to-media generation, and API-level action planning. Use when the user wants to benchmark on MixEval-X, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports accuracy.
Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Mixeval X Eval?
Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/qhjqhj00-mixeval-x-eval)
---
name: mixeval-x-eval
description: Evaluates multi-modal and agent models across any-to-any generation and action-planning tasks using real-world data mixtures. It probes capabilities in vision-language understanding, audio-language understanding, text-to-media generation, and API-level action planning. Use when the user wants to benchmark on MixEval-X, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports accuracy.
metadata:
skill_kind: dataset_eval
source_arxiv: 2410.13754
bibtex_key: ni2024mixevalx
confidence: high
---
# mixeval-x-eval
> MixEval-X: Any-to-Any Evaluations from Real-World Data Mixtures — Ni et al. (2024) (arXiv:2410.13754, 2024)
## What this evaluates
Evaluates multi-modal and agent models across any-to-any generation and action-planning tasks using real-world data mixtures. It probes capabilities in vision-language understanding, audio-language understanding, text-to-media generation, and API-level action planning.
## Datasets
- **MixEval-X** — total ?; splits: general (-1), hard (-1)
## Metrics
- `accuracy` **(primary)** — range: percent
- Percentage of correctly generated responses for MMU tasks (Image2Text, Video2Text, Audio2Text).
- `Elo score` — range: other
- Paired comparison scores derived from crowd-sourced human pairwise rankings using the Bradley-Terry model for MMG tasks (Text2Image, Text2Video, Text2Audio).
## Input / output format
**Input**: Varies by task: MMU tasks receive image/video/audio plus text prompts; MMG tasks receive text prompts; Agent tasks receive text/image plus text prompts describing the environment and user goal.
**Output**: Varies by task: MMU tasks require text responses; MMG tasks require generated image/video/audio; Agent tasks require sequences of API-level actions.
## Scoring recipe
```python
if task in MMU_TASKS:
score = 1.0 if prediction == gold else 0.0
metric = mean(score)
elif task in MMG_TASKS:
# Human pairwise ranking via MTurk
# Bradley-Terry model converts pairwise wins/losses to Elo scores
metric = compute_elo_score(pairwise_human_ratings)
elif task in AGENT_TASKS:
# Task success based on API execution or action sequence validity
metric = task_success_rate(predictions, environment_state)
```
## Common pitfalls
- MMG tasks rely on human pairwise rankings rather than automatic metrics, which fail to capture output quality nuances.
- Input formatting must be standardized; MMG tasks require caption-like prompts rewritten by GPT-4, otherwise models may fail.
- For Video2Text, frame count limits significantly impact performance, especially on long videos.
## Evidence (verbatim from paper)
> Gemini 1.5 Pro ranking first at $62.7\%$ accuracy on the general split but showing room for improvement on the Audio2Text-Hard split. ... The results are derived using the Bradley-Terry model, based on crowd-sourced user preferences.
## Citation
```bibtex
@misc{ni2024mixevalx,
title={MixEval-X: Any-to-Any Evaluations from Real-World Data Mixtures},
author={Ni et al. (2024)},
year={2024},
note={arXiv:2410.13754}
}
```
- arXiv: 2410.13754