Evaluates multi-modal and agent models across any-to-any generation and action-planning tasks using real-world data mixtures. It probes capabilities in vision-language understanding, audio-language understanding, text-to-media generation, and API-level action planning. Use when the user wants to benchmark on MixEval-X, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports accuracy.
Scanned 9/11/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add qhjqhj00/research-skills-pool --skill mixeval-x-eval --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Mixeval X Eval?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/qhjqhj00-mixeval-x-eval)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: mixeval-x-eval
description: Evaluates multi-modal and agent models across any-to-any generation and action-planning tasks using real-world data mixtures. It probes capabilities in vision-language understanding, audio-language understanding, text-to-media generation, and API-level action planning. Use when the user wants to benchmark on MixEval-X, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports accuracy.
metadata:
skill_kind: dataset_eval
source_arxiv: 2410.13754
bibtex_key: ni2024mixevalx
confidence: high
---
# mixeval-x-eval
> MixEval-X: Any-to-Any Evaluations from Real-World Data Mixtures — Ni et al. (2024) (arXiv:2410.13754, 2024)
## What this evaluates
Evaluates multi-modal and agent models across any-to-any generation and action-planning tasks using real-world data mixtures. It probes capabilities in vision-language understanding, audio-language understanding, text-to-media generation, and API-level action planning.
## Datasets
- **MixEval-X** — total ?; splits: general (-1), hard (-1)
## Metrics
- `accuracy` **(primary)** — range: percent
- Percentage of correctly generated responses for MMU tasks (Image2Text, Video2Text, Audio2Text).
- `Elo score` — range: other
- Paired comparison scores derived from crowd-sourced human pairwise rankings using the Bradley-Terry model for MMG tasks (Text2Image, Text2Video, Text2Audio).
## Input / output format
**Input**: Varies by task: MMU tasks receive image/video/audio plus text prompts; MMG tasks receive text prompts; Agent tasks receive text/image plus text prompts describing the environment and user goal.
**Output**: Varies by task: MMU tasks require text responses; MMG tasks require generated image/video/audio; Agent tasks require sequences of API-level actions.
## Scoring recipe
```python
if task in MMU_TASKS:
score = 1.0 if prediction == gold else 0.0
metric = mean(score)
elif task in MMG_TASKS:
# Human pairwise ranking via MTurk
# Bradley-Terry model converts pairwise wins/losses to Elo scores
metric = compute_elo_score(pairwise_human_ratings)
elif task in AGENT_TASKS:
# Task success based on API execution or action sequence validity
metric = task_success_rate(predictions, environment_state)
```
## Common pitfalls
- MMG tasks rely on human pairwise rankings rather than automatic metrics, which fail to capture output quality nuances.
- Input formatting must be standardized; MMG tasks require caption-like prompts rewritten by GPT-4, otherwise models may fail.
- For Video2Text, frame count limits significantly impact performance, especially on long videos.
## Evidence (verbatim from paper)
> Gemini 1.5 Pro ranking first at $62.7\%$ accuracy on the general split but showing room for improvement on the Audio2Text-Hard split. ... The results are derived using the Bradley-Terry model, based on crowd-sourced user preferences.
## Citation
```bibtex
@misc{ni2024mixevalx,
title={MixEval-X: Any-to-Any Evaluations from Real-World Data Mixtures},
author={Ni et al. (2024)},
year={2024},
note={arXiv:2410.13754}
}
```
- arXiv: 2410.13754
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!