Evaluates the ability of models to predict clinical outcomes (mortality, length of stay, shock onset) from time-aligned ICU patient trajectories and treatment dynamics. Use when the user wants to benchmark on MIMIC-Sepsis, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports performance.
Scanned 9/11/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add qhjqhj00/research-skills-pool --skill mimic-sepsis-eval --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Mimic Sepsis Eval?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/qhjqhj00-mimic-sepsis-eval)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: mimic-sepsis-eval
description: Evaluates the ability of models to predict clinical outcomes (mortality, length of stay, shock onset) from time-aligned ICU patient trajectories and treatment dynamics. Use when the user wants to benchmark on MIMIC-Sepsis, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports performance.
metadata:
skill_kind: dataset_eval
source_arxiv: 2510.24500
bibtex_key: huang2025mimicsepsis
confidence: medium
---
# mimic-sepsis-eval
> MIMIC-Sepsis: A Curated Benchmark for Modeling and Learning from Sepsis Trajectories in the ICU — Huang et al. (2025) (arXiv:2510.24500, 2025)
## What this evaluates
Evaluates the ability of models to predict clinical outcomes (mortality, length of stay, shock onset) from time-aligned ICU patient trajectories and treatment dynamics.
## Datasets
- **MIMIC-Sepsis** — total 35239; splits: train (-1), val (-1), test (-1); repo https://github.com/yongh7/MIMIC-sepsis
## Metrics
- `performance` **(primary)** — range: [0, 1]
- General predictive performance measured via accuracy for binary classification tasks (mortality, shock onset) and MAE for continuous regression (length of stay).
## Input / output format
**Input**: Time-aligned clinical trajectories resampled to 4-hour intervals from 24 hours before to 72 hours after suspected infection onset, including static demographics, longitudinal vitals/labs, and cumulative treatment interventions (vasopressors, fluids, antibiotics, ventilation).
**Output**: Predictions for three tasks: binary mortality status, continuous length of stay, and binary shock onset status.
## Scoring recipe
```python
def score(predictions, gold):
if task in ['mortality', 'shock']:
return sum(p == g for p, g in zip(predictions, gold)) / len(gold)
elif task == 'los':
return sum(abs(p - g) for p, g in zip(predictions, gold)) / len(gold)
return None
```
## Common pitfalls
- Imputation strategy varies by missingness level (<5% linear, <80% KNN, >80% excluded), which can bias results if not replicated.
- Temporal alignment is strictly relative to suspected infection onset (Sepsis-3 criteria), not ICU admission.
- Treatment variables are cumulative per 4-hour interval, requiring careful handling of dosing conversions (e.g., norepinephrine-equivalent).
## Evidence (verbatim from paper)
> Empirical results show that integrating treatment dynamics significantly improves performance of Transformer-based models, especially in early mortality prediction, length-of-stay estimation, and shock onset classification—demonstrating the critical role of treatment-aware modeling in critical care prediction.
## Citation
```bibtex
@misc{huang2025mimicsepsis,
title={MIMIC-Sepsis: A Curated Benchmark for Modeling and Learning from Sepsis Trajectories in the ICU},
author={Huang et al. (2025)},
year={2025},
note={arXiv:2510.24500}
}
```
- arXiv: 2510.24500
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!