Evaluates the ability of models to predict clinical outcomes (mortality, length of stay, shock onset) from time-aligned ICU patient trajectories and treatment dynamics. Use when the user wants to benchmark on MIMIC-Sepsis, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports performance.
Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Mimic Sepsis Eval?
Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/qhjqhj00-mimic-sepsis-eval)
---
name: mimic-sepsis-eval
description: Evaluates the ability of models to predict clinical outcomes (mortality, length of stay, shock onset) from time-aligned ICU patient trajectories and treatment dynamics. Use when the user wants to benchmark on MIMIC-Sepsis, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports performance.
metadata:
skill_kind: dataset_eval
source_arxiv: 2510.24500
bibtex_key: [REDACTED]
confidence: medium
---
# mimic-sepsis-eval
> MIMIC-Sepsis: A Curated Benchmark for Modeling and Learning from Sepsis Trajectories in the ICU — Huang et al. (2025) (arXiv:2510.24500, 2025)
## What this evaluates
Evaluates the ability of models to predict clinical outcomes (mortality, length of stay, shock onset) from time-aligned ICU patient trajectories and treatment dynamics.
## Datasets
- **MIMIC-Sepsis** — total 35239; splits: train (-1), val (-1), test (-1); repo https://github.com/yongh7/MIMIC-sepsis
## Metrics
- `performance` **(primary)** — range: [0, 1]
- General predictive performance measured via accuracy for binary classification tasks (mortality, shock onset) and MAE for continuous regression (length of stay).
## Input / output format
**Input**: Time-aligned clinical trajectories resampled to 4-hour intervals from 24 hours before to 72 hours after suspected infection onset, including static demographics, longitudinal vitals/labs, and cumulative treatment interventions (vasopressors, fluids, antibiotics, ventilation).
**Output**: Predictions for three tasks: binary mortality status, continuous length of stay, and binary shock onset status.
## Scoring recipe
```python
def score(predictions, gold):
if task in ['mortality', 'shock']:
return sum(p == g for p, g in zip(predictions, gold)) / len(gold)
elif task == 'los':
return sum(abs(p - g) for p, g in zip(predictions, gold)) / len(gold)
return None
```
## Common pitfalls
- Imputation strategy varies by missingness level (<5% linear, <80% KNN, >80% excluded), which can bias results if not replicated.
- Temporal alignment is strictly relative to suspected infection onset (Sepsis-3 criteria), not ICU admission.
- Treatment variables are cumulative per 4-hour interval, requiring careful handling of dosing conversions (e.g., norepinephrine-equivalent).
## Evidence (verbatim from paper)
> Empirical results show that integrating treatment dynamics significantly improves performance of Transformer-based models, especially in early mortality prediction, length-of-stay estimation, and shock onset classification—demonstrating the critical role of treatment-aware modeling in critical care prediction.
## Citation
```bibtex
@misc{huang2025mimicsepsis,
title={MIMIC-Sepsis: A Curated Benchmark for Modeling and Learning from Sepsis Trajectories in the ICU},
author={Huang et al. (2025)},
year={2025},
note={arXiv:2510.24500}
}
```
- arXiv: 2510.24500