Skip to content
Back to skills

Message Level Polarity Eval

ASecurity

Determines the overall sentiment polarity of an entire tweet, addressing class imbalance, slang, and informal social media text. Use when the user wants to benchmark on Twitter2015-test, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports macro-averaged F1.

  • 3 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 1 view
  • Added September 11, 2026
researchpython

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned September 11, 2026

npx -y skills add qhjqhj00/research-skills-pool --skill message-level-polarity-eval --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Message Level Polarity Eval?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Message Level Polarity Eval
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/qhjqhj00-message-level-polarity-eval/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/qhjqhj00-message-level-polarity-eval)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: message-level-polarity-eval
description: Determines the overall sentiment polarity of an entire tweet, addressing class imbalance, slang, and informal social media text. Use when the user wants to benchmark on Twitter2015-test, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports macro-averaged F1.
metadata:
  skill_kind: dataset_eval
  source_arxiv: 1912.02387
  bibtex_key: [REDACTED]
  confidence: high
---

# message-level-polarity-eval

> SemEval-2015 Task 10: Sentiment Analysis in Twitter — Rosenthal et al. (2015) (SemEval-2015 / arXiv:1912.02387, 2015)

## What this evaluates

Determines the overall sentiment polarity of an entire tweet, addressing class imbalance, slang, and informal social media text.

## Datasets

- **Twitter2015-test** — total ?; splits: test (-1)

## Metrics

- `macro-averaged F1` **(primary)** — range: [0, 1]
  - Harmonic mean of precision and recall averaged across all classes (positive, negative, neutral).

## Input / output format

**Input**: A full tweet.

**Output**: Sentiment polarity label (positive, negative, or neutral).

## Scoring recipe

```python
prec = rec = 0
for class in ['pos', 'neg', 'neu']:
    prec += precision(y_true, y_pred, class)
    rec += recall(y_true, y_pred, class)
macro_prec = prec / 3
macro_rec = rec / 3
f1 = 2 * (macro_prec * macro_rec) / (macro_prec + macro_rec)
```

## Common pitfalls

- Baseline majority class F1 is ~30.3%, so models must significantly outperform simple majority voting.
- Sarcastic tweets are a subset of the test set and evaluated separately; models trained on non-sarcastic data often degrade on this subset.

## Evidence (verbatim from paper)

> The results for subtask B are shown in Table 11. ... with an F1 of 64.84, unitn with 64.59, lislif with 64.27, and INESC-ID with 64.17.

## Citation

```bibtex
@misc{rosenthal2015semeval,
  title={SemEval-2015 Task 10: Sentiment Analysis in Twitter},
  author={Rosenthal et al. (2015)},
  year={2015},
  note={SemEval-2015 / arXiv:1912.02387}
}
```

- arXiv: 1912.02387

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.