Skip to content
Back to skills

Medmcqa Eval

ASecurity

Evaluates a model's ability to answer medical multiple-choice questions, testing both domain-specific knowledge retrieval and deep medical reasoning capabilities. Use when the user wants to benchmark on MedMCQA, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports accuracy.

  • 3 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 0 views
  • Added September 11, 2026
researchpythongotestinggit

Works with

  • cli

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned September 11, 2026

npx -y skills add qhjqhj00/research-skills-pool --skill medmcqa-eval --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Medmcqa Eval?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Medmcqa Eval
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/qhjqhj00-medmcqa-eval/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/qhjqhj00-medmcqa-eval)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: medmcqa-eval
description: Evaluates a model's ability to answer medical multiple-choice questions, testing both domain-specific knowledge retrieval and deep medical reasoning capabilities. Use when the user wants to benchmark on MedMCQA, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports accuracy.
metadata:
  skill_kind: dataset_eval
  source_arxiv: 2203.14371
  bibtex_key: pal2022medmcqa
  confidence: high
---

# medmcqa-eval

> MedMCQA : A Large-scale Multi-Subject Multi-Choice Dataset for Medical domain Question Answering — Pal et al. (2022) (arXiv:2203.14371, 2022)

## What this evaluates

Evaluates a model's ability to answer medical multiple-choice questions, testing both domain-specific knowledge retrieval and deep medical reasoning capabilities.

## Datasets

- **MedMCQA** — total ?; splits: train (-1), val (-1), test (-1)

## Metrics

- `accuracy` **(primary)** — range: [0, 1]
  - Standard multiple-choice accuracy: the proportion of questions where the model's predicted option exactly matches the ground-truth correct option.

## Input / output format

**Input**: Concatenated sequence: [CLS] Context [SEP] Question [SEP] Option [SEP] (with context) or [CLS] Question [SEP] Option [SEP] (without context). Passages are truncated to 250 tokens.

**Output**: A single predicted option index selected via softmax over the [CLS] token's final hidden state.

## Scoring recipe

```python
correct = 0
for q, options, gold_idx in dataset:
    logits = model(input_ids)
    pred_idx = argmax(logits[0])
    if pred_idx == gold_idx:
        correct += 1
accuracy = correct / len(dataset)
```

## Common pitfalls

- Retrieval errors from the dense passage retriever are often conflated with the reader model's reasoning failures.
- Truncating medical passages to 250 tokens may discard critical clinical details needed to answer the question.
- Evaluating only on the test set without reporting calibration or confidence scores limits understanding of model reliability in high-stakes medical domains.

## Evidence (verbatim from paper)

> A linear layer with softmax is applied over the output of the [CLS] token of the encoder. This is to select the most appropriate option for a question and context pair. ... The model checkpoint with the highest validation score in the 5 epochs was selected and used to evaluate the Test Set.

## Citation

```bibtex
@misc{pal2022medmcqa,
  title={MedMCQA : A Large-scale Multi-Subject Multi-Choice Dataset for Medical domain Question Answering},
  author={Pal et al. (2022)},
  year={2022},
  note={arXiv:2203.14371}
}
```

- arXiv: 2203.14371

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.