This evaluation protocol assesses the transfer learning capability of self-supervised and supervised vision models on multimodal, multitemporal, and multispectral Earth observation data. It probes downstream performance on tree species classification and agricultural/land cover segmentation tasks across varying dataset scales and fusion strategies. Use when the user wants to benchmark on TreeSatAI-TS, PASTIS-HD, FLAIR#2, FLAIR-HUB, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports weighted F1 score...
Scanned 9/11/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add qhjqhj00/research-skills-pool --skill maestro-eval --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Maestro Eval?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/qhjqhj00-maestro-eval)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: maestro-eval
description: This evaluation protocol assesses the transfer learning capability of self-supervised and supervised vision models on multimodal, multitemporal, and multispectral Earth observation data. It probes downstream performance on tree species classification and agricultural/land cover segmentation tasks across varying dataset scales and fusion strategies. Use when the user wants to benchmark on TreeSatAI-TS, PASTIS-HD, FLAIR#2, FLAIR-HUB, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports weighted F1 score, mIoU.
metadata:
skill_kind: dataset_eval
source_arxiv: 2508.10894
bibtex_key: labatie2025maestro
confidence: high
---
# maestro-eval
> MAESTRO: Masked AutoEncoders for Multimodal, Multitemporal, and Multispectral Earth Observation Data — Labatie et al. (2025) (arXiv:2508.10894, 2025)
## What this evaluates
This evaluation protocol assesses the transfer learning capability of self-supervised and supervised vision models on multimodal, multitemporal, and multispectral Earth observation data. It probes downstream performance on tree species classification and agricultural/land cover segmentation tasks across varying dataset scales and fusion strategies.
## Datasets
- **TreeSatAI-TS** — total 50381; splits: train (-1), val (-1), test (-1)
- **PASTIS-HD** — total 433; splits: fold I (-1)
- **FLAIR#2** — total 77762; splits: split 1 (-1)
- **FLAIR-HUB** — total 241100; splits: split 1 (-1)
## Metrics
- `weighted F1 score` **(primary)** — range: [0, 100] percent
- F1 score computed per class and averaged, weighted by the number of true instances per class. Calculated as 2 * (precision * recall) / (precision + recall + epsilon).
- `mIoU` **(primary)** — range: [0, 100] percent
- Mean Intersection over Union across all semantic classes. Computed as the average of TP / (TP + FP + FN) for each class, where TP, FP, and FN are true positives, false positives, and false negatives.
## Input / output format
**Input**: Multimodal image tiles containing aerial imagery (RGB+NIR), Sentinel-1/2 time series, and elevation data (DSM/DEM), processed into fixed-size patches for token-based model input.
**Output**: Per-pixel or per-tile class predictions: 15 multi-label tree species classes for TreeSatAI-TS, or 12/15 semantic segmentation masks for PASTIS-HD, FLAIR#2, and FLAIR-HUB.
## Scoring recipe
```python
def compute_miou(preds, gold, num_classes):
ious = []
for c in range(num_classes):
tp = np.sum((preds == c) & (gold == c))
fp = np.sum((preds == c) & (gold != c))
fn = np.sum((preds != c) & (gold == c))
iou = tp / (tp + fp + fn + 1e-6)
ious.append(iou)
return np.mean(ious) * 100
def compute_weighted_f1(preds, gold, num_classes):
f1s, weights = [], []
for c in range(num_classes):
tp = np.sum((preds == c) & (gold == c))
fp = np.sum((preds == c) & (gold != c))
fn = np.sum((preds != c) & (gold == c))
prec = tp / (tp + fp + 1e-6)
rec = tp / (tp + fn + 1e-6)
f1 = 2 * prec * rec / (prec + rec + 1e-6)
f1s.append(f1)
weights.append(np.sum(gold == c))
return np.average(f1s, weights=weights) * 100
```
## Common pitfalls
- Pre-training must strictly exclude test data; using the union of training and validation sets for self-supervised learning is required to prevent data leakage.
- Models must be evaluated on the exact dataset splits/folds specified (e.g., PASTIS-HD fold I, FLAIR split 1) to ensure comparability with reported baselines.
- Baseline foundation models require extensive hyperparameter tuning for fair comparison, as default settings may not reflect operational performance.
## Evidence (verbatim from paper)
> We report the weighted F1 score (%) on TreeSatAI-TS and the mIoU (%) on PASTIS-HD, FLAIR#2, and FLAIR-HUB.
## Citation
```bibtex
@misc{labatie2025maestro,
title={MAESTRO: Masked AutoEncoders for Multimodal, Multitemporal, and Multispectral Earth Observation Data},
author={Labatie et al. (2025)},
year={2025},
note={arXiv:2508.10894}
}
```
- arXiv: 2508.10894
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!