This benchmark evaluates long-context video-language understanding by testing a model's ability to retrieve specific moments from lengthy videos and reason over multimodal details. It distinguishes between single-moment visual perception and multi-moment relational reasoning across 17 fine-grained categories. Use when the user wants to benchmark on LongVideoBench, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports accuracy.
Scanned 9/11/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add qhjqhj00/research-skills-pool --skill longvideo-bench-eval --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Longvideo Bench Eval?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/qhjqhj00-longvideo-bench-eval)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: longvideo-bench-eval
description: This benchmark evaluates long-context video-language understanding by testing a model's ability to retrieve specific moments from lengthy videos and reason over multimodal details. It distinguishes between single-moment visual perception and multi-moment relational reasoning across 17 fine-grained categories. Use when the user wants to benchmark on LongVideoBench, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports accuracy.
metadata:
skill_kind: dataset_eval
source_arxiv: 2407.15754
bibtex_key: wu2024longvideobench
confidence: medium
---
# longvideo-bench-eval
> LongVideoBench: A Benchmark for Long-context Interleaved Video-Language Understanding — Wu et al. (2024) (arXiv:2407.15754, 2024)
## What this evaluates
This benchmark evaluates long-context video-language understanding by testing a model's ability to retrieve specific moments from lengthy videos and reason over multimodal details. It distinguishes between single-moment visual perception and multi-moment relational reasoning across 17 fine-grained categories.
## Datasets
- **LongVideoBench** — total 6678; splits: test (6678)
## Metrics
- `accuracy` **(primary)** — range: [0, 1]
- The proportion of questions where the model's predicted option exactly matches the ground-truth correct answer.
## Input / output format
**Input**: A long video (up to 60 minutes) with interleaved frames and subtitles, a referring query that identifies specific moments, and a multiple-choice question requiring reasoning over those moments.
**Output**: The model must select the correct answer option from the provided multiple-choice list.
## Scoring recipe
```python
def compute_accuracy(predictions, golds):
correct = sum(1 for pred, gold in zip(predictions, golds) if pred == gold)
return correct / len(golds)
```
## Common pitfalls
- Models may exploit single-frame bias or short-context shortcuts instead of truly reasoning over long sequences.
- Confusion between L1 (single-moment perception) and L2 (multi-moment relational) tasks can skew category-level performance analysis.
- Subtitle-based referring queries may be answered via text-only pathways, bypassing actual video understanding.
## Evidence (verbatim from paper)
> We employ the multiple-choice question format, where several distracting options are provided alongside the correct answer option.
## Citation
```bibtex
@misc{wu2024longvideobench,
title={LongVideoBench: A Benchmark for Long-context Interleaved Video-Language Understanding},
author={Wu et al. (2024)},
year={2024},
note={arXiv:2407.15754}
}
```
- arXiv: 2407.15754
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!