Skip to content
Back to skills

Lip2wav Eval

ASecurity

Evaluates a model's ability to synthesize natural, speaker-specific speech from unconstrained lip movements in large-vocabulary settings. It measures how well the model captures individual speaking styles and contextual cues from video frames. Use when the user wants to benchmark on Lip2Wav, GRID, TCD-TIMIT lip speaker corpus, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports mel reconstruction loss.

  • 3 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 1 view
  • Added September 11, 2026
researchpythongotestinggitperformance

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned September 11, 2026

npx -y skills add qhjqhj00/research-skills-pool --skill lip2wav-eval --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Lip2wav Eval?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Lip2wav Eval
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/qhjqhj00-lip2wav-eval/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/qhjqhj00-lip2wav-eval)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: lip2wav-eval
description: Evaluates a model's ability to synthesize natural, speaker-specific speech from unconstrained lip movements in large-vocabulary settings. It measures how well the model captures individual speaking styles and contextual cues from video frames. Use when the user wants to benchmark on Lip2Wav, GRID, TCD-TIMIT lip speaker corpus, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports mel reconstruction loss.
metadata:
  skill_kind: dataset_eval
  source_arxiv: 2005.08209
  bibtex_key: [REDACTED]
  confidence: high
---

# lip2wav-eval

> Learning Individual Speaking Styles for Accurate Lip to Speech Synthesis — Prajwal et al. (2020) (arXiv:2005.08209, 2020)

## What this evaluates

Evaluates a model's ability to synthesize natural, speaker-specific speech from unconstrained lip movements in large-vocabulary settings. It measures how well the model captures individual speaking styles and contextual cues from video frames.

## Datasets

- **Lip2Wav** — total ?; splits: train (-1), val (-1), test (-1); repo https://github.com/Rudrabha/Lip2Wav
- **GRID** — total ?; splits: train (-1), val (-1), test (-1)
- **TCD-TIMIT lip speaker corpus** — total ?; splits: train (-1), val (-1), test (-1)

## Metrics

- `mel reconstruction loss` **(primary)** — range: other
  - Computed as the mean squared error (MSE) between the predicted and ground-truth mel-spectrogram frames: L = (1/N) Σ (y_pred - y_true)². Lower values indicate better spectral reconstruction fidelity.

## Input / output format

**Input**: Contiguous 3-second sequence of video frames (face crops resized to 48×48) representing lip movements.

**Output**: Generated speech waveform (produced via Griffin-Lim algorithm from predicted mel-spectrograms).

## Scoring recipe

```python
def compute_mel_reconstruction_loss(pred_mels, gt_mels):
    # pred_mels and gt_mels: tensors of shape (T, F)
    loss = torch.mean((pred_mels - gt_mels) ** 2)
    return loss.item()
```

## Common pitfalls

- Video-level splitting is mandatory to prevent data leakage between train and test sets.
- Griffin-Lim vocoder is explicitly used over neural vocoders due to lower accuracy of generated mel-spectrograms.
- Sliding window inference requires overlap to adjust for boundary effects, which must be accounted for during evaluation.

## Evidence (verbatim from paper)

> train until the mel reconstruction loss plateaus for at least 30K iterations. ... The model with the best performance on the validation set is chosen for testing and evaluation.

## Citation

```bibtex
@misc{prajwal2020lip2wav,
  title={Learning Individual Speaking Styles for Accurate Lip to Speech Synthesis},
  author={Prajwal et al. (2020)},
  year={2020},
  note={arXiv:2005.08209}
}
```

- arXiv: 2005.08209

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.