Generate novel research ideas with iterative refinement and novelty checking against literature. Score ideas on Interestingness, Feasibility, and Novelty. Use when brainstorming research directions or validating idea novelty.
Scanned 9/11/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add qhjqhj00/research-skills-pool --skill lingzhi227--agent-research-skills--skills__idea-generation --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Lingzhi227 Agent Research Skills Skills Idea Generation?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/qhjqhj00-lingzhi227-agent-research-skills-skills-idea-gener)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: idea-generation
description: Generate novel research ideas with iterative refinement and novelty checking against literature. Score ideas on Interestingness, Feasibility, and Novelty. Use when brainstorming research directions or validating idea novelty.
argument-hint: [research-area]
---
# Idea Generation
Generate and refine novel research ideas with literature-backed novelty assessment.
## Input
- `$0` — Research area, task description, or existing codebase context
- `$1` — Optional: additional context (e.g., "for NeurIPS", constraints)
## Scripts
### Novelty check against Semantic Scholar
```bash
python ~/.claude/skills/idea-generation/scripts/novelty_check.py \
--idea "Adaptive attention head pruning via gradient-guided importance" \
--max-rounds 5
```
Performs iterative literature search to assess if an idea is novel.
## References
- Ideation prompts (generation, reflection, novelty): `~/.claude/skills/idea-generation/references/ideation-prompts.md`
## Workflow
### Step 1: Generate Ideas
Given a research area and optional code/paper context:
1. Generate 3-5 diverse research ideas
2. For each idea, provide: Name, Title, Experiment plan, and ratings
3. Use the ideation prompt templates from references
### Step 2: Iterative Refinement (up to 5 rounds per idea)
For each idea:
1. Critically evaluate quality, novelty, and feasibility
2. Refine the idea while preserving its core spirit
3. Stop when converged ("I am done") or max rounds reached
### Step 3: Novelty Assessment
For each promising idea:
1. Run `novelty_check.py` or manually search Semantic Scholar / arXiv
2. Use the novelty checking prompts from references
3. Multi-round search: generate queries, review results, decide
4. Binary decision: Novel / Not Novel with justification
### Step 4: Rank and Select
- Score each idea on three dimensions (1-10): Interestingness, Feasibility, Novelty
- Be cautious and realistic on ratings
- Select the top idea(s) for development
## Output Format
```json
{
"Name": "adaptive_attention_pruning",
"Title": "Adaptive Attention Head Pruning via Gradient-Guided Importance Scoring",
"Experiment": "Detailed implementation plan...",
"Interestingness": 8,
"Feasibility": 7,
"Novelty": 9,
"novel": true,
"most_similar_papers": ["paper1", "paper2"]
}
```
## Rules
- Ideas must be feasible with available resources (no requiring new datasets or massive compute)
- Do not overfit ideas to a specific dataset or model — aim for wider significance
- Be a harsh critic for novelty — ensure sufficient contribution for a conference paper
- Each idea should stem from a simple, elegant question or hypothesis
- Always check novelty before committing to an idea
## Related Skills
- Upstream: [literature-search](../literature-search/), [deep-research](../deep-research/)
- Downstream: [research-planning](../research-planning/), [experiment-design](../experiment-design/)
- See also: [novelty-assessment](../novelty-assessment/)
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!