Skip to content
Back to skills

Librispeech Chime4 Asr Eval

ASecurity

Evaluates the robustness of automatic speech recognition (ASR) models under various noise conditions and signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) using simulated and real-world noisy speech datasets. Use when the user wants to benchmark on LibriSpeech, CHiME-4, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports WER.

  • 3 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 2 views
  • Added September 11, 2026
researchpythontestingperformance

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned September 11, 2026

npx -y skills add qhjqhj00/research-skills-pool --skill librispeech-chime4-asr-eval --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Librispeech Chime4 Asr Eval?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Librispeech Chime4 Asr Eval
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/qhjqhj00-librispeech-chime4-asr-eval/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/qhjqhj00-librispeech-chime4-asr-eval)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: librispeech-chime4-asr-eval
description: Evaluates the robustness of automatic speech recognition (ASR) models under various noise conditions and signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) using simulated and real-world noisy speech datasets. Use when the user wants to benchmark on LibriSpeech, CHiME-4, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports WER.
metadata:
  skill_kind: dataset_eval
  source_arxiv: 2304.04974
  bibtex_key: hu2023wav2code
  confidence: high
---

# librispeech-chime4-asr-eval

> Wav2code: Restore Clean Speech Representations via Codebook Lookup for Noise-Robust ASR — Hu et al. (2023) (arXiv:2304.04974, 2023)

## What this evaluates

Evaluates the robustness of automatic speech recognition (ASR) models under various noise conditions and signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) using simulated and real-world noisy speech datasets.

## Datasets

- **LibriSpeech** — total ?; splits: train (-1), val (-1), test (4200)
- **CHiME-4** — total ?; splits: train (8738), val (3280), test (2640); repo http://spandh.dcs.shef.ac.uk/chime_challenge/CHiME4/index.html

## Metrics

- `WER` **(primary)** — range: percent
  - Word Error Rate, calculated as the number of substitutions, deletions, and insertions required to transform the predicted transcript into the reference transcript, divided by the total number of words in the reference.

## Input / output format

**Input**: Noisy audio waveform (16 kHz) and corresponding reference transcript.

**Output**: Predicted text transcript.

## Scoring recipe

```python
def compute_wer(predictions, references):
    total_errors = 0
    total_words = 0
    for pred, ref in zip(predictions, references):
        total_errors += levenshtein_distance(pred.split(), ref.split())
        total_words += len(ref.split())
    return (total_errors / total_words) * 100 if total_words > 0 else 0.0
```

## Common pitfalls

- The paper explicitly states no language model (LM) is used during inference for LibriSpeech, whereas many baselines and prior works do use one.
- CHiME-4 evaluation uses only the one-channel track for validation and testing, despite training on all six channels.
- WER is averaged across SNR levels in the tables, which can mask performance degradation at lower SNRs.

## Evidence (verbatim from paper)

> “Avg” denotes the averaged WER results on all type-A noise conditions, and “Clean” denotes the WER results on clean test set.

## Citation

```bibtex
@misc{hu2023wav2code,
  title={Wav2code: Restore Clean Speech Representations via Codebook Lookup for Noise-Robust ASR},
  author={Hu et al. (2023)},
  year={2023},
  note={arXiv:2304.04974}
}
```

- arXiv: 2304.04974

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.