Probes the ability of zero-shot text-to-speech systems to generate expressive, character-specific utterances while preserving reference speaker timbre. It evaluates cross-sentence generation where a narration clip guides the synthesis of a fictional quotation, testing prosodic variability, emotional expressiveness, and speech intelligibility. Use when the user wants to benchmark on LibriQuote, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports WER.
Scanned 9/11/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add qhjqhj00/research-skills-pool --skill libriquote-eval --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Libriquote Eval?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/qhjqhj00-libriquote-eval)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: libriquote-eval
description: Probes the ability of zero-shot text-to-speech systems to generate expressive, character-specific utterances while preserving reference speaker timbre. It evaluates cross-sentence generation where a narration clip guides the synthesis of a fictional quotation, testing prosodic variability, emotional expressiveness, and speech intelligibility. Use when the user wants to benchmark on LibriQuote, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports WER.
metadata:
skill_kind: dataset_eval
source_arxiv: 2509.04072
bibtex_key: michel2025libriquote
confidence: high
---
# libriquote-eval
> LibriQuote: A Speech Dataset of Fictional Character Utterances for Expressive Zero-Shot Speech Synthesis — Michel et al. (2025) (arXiv:2509.04072, 2025)
## What this evaluates
Probes the ability of zero-shot text-to-speech systems to generate expressive, character-specific utterances while preserving reference speaker timbre. It evaluates cross-sentence generation where a narration clip guides the synthesis of a fictional quotation, testing prosodic variability, emotional expressiveness, and speech intelligibility.
## Datasets
- **LibriQuote** — total ?; splits: train (-1), test (-1); repo https://github.com/deezer/libriquote
## Metrics
- `WER` **(primary)** — range: percent
- Word Error Rate computed using Whisper-large-v3 transcription against the target text. Lower is better.
- `SIM-O` — range: [-1, 1]
- Cosine similarity between speaker embeddings extracted from a WavLM-large verification model for synthesized and ground-truth audio. Higher is better.
- `MCD` — range: other
- Mel Cepstral Distortion measuring spectral envelope difference between synthesized and ground-truth speech. Lower is better.
- `FPC` — range: [-1, 1]
- Pearson correlation coefficient between fundamental frequency (F0) contours of synthesized and ground-truth speech. Higher is better.
- `MOS` — range: [1, 5]
- Mean Opinion Score rated by human listeners on a scale from 1 to 5 (0.5 intervals) to assess naturalness.
- `CMOS` — range: [-3, 3]
- Comparative MOS rated from -3 to 3, measuring the degree of expressivity of synthesized speech relative to ground-truth.
## Input / output format
**Input**: Reference narration audio clip (2–15 seconds), target quotation text, and optionally left/right context text tokens.
**Output**: Synthesized audio waveform matching the target quotation text.
## Scoring recipe
```python
# Objective metrics
wer = whisper_transcribe(prediction_audio) / len(gold_text_words)
sim_o = cosine_similarity(wavlm_embed(prediction_audio), wavlm_embed(gold_audio))
mcd = compute_mel_cepstral_distortion(prediction_audio, gold_audio)
fpc = pearson_correlation(f0_contour(prediction_audio), f0_contour(gold_audio))
# Subjective metrics (human evaluation)
mos = mean([rater.score(prediction_audio, scale=[1,5]) for rater in raters])
cmos = mean([rater.score(prediction_audio, reference=gold_audio, scale=[-3,3]) for rater in raters])
```
## Common pitfalls
- High WER on ground-truth quotations is expected due to high expressiveness and fictional delivery, not a data quality issue.
- Speaker similarity (SIM-O) is computed against the original ground-truth speaker, not the reference narration speaker used for zero-shot prompting, which can cause confusion.
- Subjective evaluation relies on a small sample size (30 utterances, 2 per speaker) with only 5 raters, limiting statistical power for CMOS/MOS.
## Evidence (verbatim from paper)
> For objective metrics, we report Word Error Rate (WER) computed with Whisper-large-v3 (Radford et al. [2023]) to measure speech intelligibility and speaker similarity between the synthesized speech and the original ground-truth speech (SIM-O). We employ a WavLM-large based speaker verification model (Chen et al. [2022]) to extract speaker embeddings and calculate cosine similarities. We evaluate prosody similarity with the ground truth quotation using Mel Cepstral Distortion (MCD) and F0 Pearson correlation (FPC) following (Huang et al. [2023]).
## Citation
```bibtex
@misc{michel2025libriquote,
title={LibriQuote: A Speech Dataset of Fictional Character Utterances for Expressive Zero-Shot Speech Synthesis},
author={Michel et al. (2025)},
year={2025},
note={arXiv:2509.04072}
}
```
- arXiv: 2509.04072
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!