Probes the ability to extract aspect-based sentiment quadruples (target, aspect, opinion, sentiment) from text in low-resource agglutinative languages. It evaluates exact-match performance across entity detection, relation linking, and full quadruple composition. Use when the user wants to benchmark on LASQ, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports F1.
Scanned 9/11/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add qhjqhj00/research-skills-pool --skill lasq-eval --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Lasq Eval?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/qhjqhj00-lasq-eval)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: lasq-eval
description: Probes the ability to extract aspect-based sentiment quadruples (target, aspect, opinion, sentiment) from text in low-resource agglutinative languages. It evaluates exact-match performance across entity detection, relation linking, and full quadruple composition. Use when the user wants to benchmark on LASQ, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports F1.
metadata:
skill_kind: dataset_eval
source_arxiv: 2604.10417
bibtex_key: yusufu2026lasq
confidence: high
---
# lasq-eval
> LASQ: A Low-resource Aspect-based Sentiment Quadruple Extraction Dataset — Yusufu et al. (arXiv:2604.10417, 2026)
## What this evaluates
Probes the ability to extract aspect-based sentiment quadruples (target, aspect, opinion, sentiment) from text in low-resource agglutinative languages. It evaluates exact-match performance across entity detection, relation linking, and full quadruple composition.
## Datasets
- **LASQ** — total ?; splits: train (-1), dev (-1), test (-1)
## Metrics
- `F1` **(primary)** — range: percent
- Precision, recall, and F1 are computed based on exact match of predicted quadruples against gold quadruples. A prediction is correct only if all four components (target, aspect, opinion, sentiment) match the gold standard exactly.
## Input / output format
**Input**: Raw text sentence in Uzbek or Uyghur.
**Output**: A list of quadruples, each containing (Target, Aspect, Opinion, Sentiment).
## Scoring recipe
```python
def compute_f1(predictions, golds):
correct = sum(1 for p in predictions if p in golds)
precision = correct / len(predictions) if predictions else 0
recall = correct / len(golds) if golds else 0
f1 = 2 * precision * recall / (precision + recall) if (precision + recall) > 0 else 0
return f1 * 100
```
## Common pitfalls
- Exact match is strictly required; partial overlaps or synonym substitutions do not count as correct.
- The task requires extracting four linked components per quadruple, making it sensitive to cascading errors in entity and relation detection.
- Agglutinative morphology in Uzbek and Uyghur can cause tokenization mismatches if subword boundaries are not handled carefully.
## Evidence (verbatim from paper)
> Our evaluation metrics follow [meatwp], using the precision (P), recall (R) and F1. These metrics can be used to detect entities, relations and quadruple. For an item to be considered a correct prediction, it needs to match the gold standard exactly.
## Citation
```bibtex
@misc{yusufu2026lasq,
title={LASQ: A Low-resource Aspect-based Sentiment Quadruple Extraction Dataset},
author={Yusufu et al.},
year={2026},
note={arXiv:2604.10417}
}
```
- arXiv: 2604.10417
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!