Evaluates GPT-3's ability to predict ground-truth labels for given instances, and analyzes whether explanation quality correlates with prediction correctness across different datasets. Use when the user wants to benchmark on CommonsenseQA, SNLI, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports accuracy.
Scanned 9/11/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add qhjqhj00/research-skills-pool --skill label-accuracy-eval --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Label Accuracy Eval?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/qhjqhj00-label-accuracy-eval)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: label-accuracy-eval
description: Evaluates GPT-3's ability to predict ground-truth labels for given instances, and analyzes whether explanation quality correlates with prediction correctness across different datasets. Use when the user wants to benchmark on CommonsenseQA, SNLI, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports accuracy.
metadata:
skill_kind: dataset_eval
source_arxiv: 2112.08674
bibtex_key: wiegreffe2021reframing
confidence: medium
---
# label-accuracy-eval
> Reframing Human-AI Collaboration for Generating Free-Text Explanations — Wiegreffe et al. (2021) (arXiv:2112.08674, 2021)
## What this evaluates
Evaluates GPT-3's ability to predict ground-truth labels for given instances, and analyzes whether explanation quality correlates with prediction correctness across different datasets.
## Datasets
- **CommonsenseQA** — total ?; splits: test (-1)
- **SNLI** — total ?; splits: test (-1)
## Metrics
- `accuracy` **(primary)** — range: percent
- Percentage of instances where the model's predicted label matches the ground-truth label.
## Input / output format
**Input**: Question/context instance formatted as a prompt, explicitly excluding the 'why?' token and any gold explanations.
**Output**: A single predicted label corresponding to the instance.
## Scoring recipe
```python
correct = 0
for pred, gold in zip(predictions, gold_labels):
if pred == gold:
correct += 1
accuracy = (correct / len(gold_labels)) * 100
```
## Common pitfalls
- Low accuracy on SNLI (46%) reflects known difficulties with sentence-comparison tasks, not necessarily poor explanation generation.
- High label accuracy does not guarantee that generated explanations are faithful or 'right for the right reasons'.
## Evidence (verbatim from paper)
> GPT-3 achieves 50.8% accuracy on CommonsenseQA compared to a 20% random baseline, and 46% accuracy on SNLI compared to a 33.33% random baseline.
## Citation
```bibtex
@misc{wiegreffe2021reframing,
title={Reframing Human-AI Collaboration for Generating Free-Text Explanations},
author={Wiegreffe et al. (2021)},
year={2021},
note={arXiv:2112.08674}
}
```
- arXiv: 2112.08674
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!