Evaluates sentiment classification capability on Kyrgyz language text. It measures how effectively a model can distinguish between positive and negative sentiments using a manually annotated benchmark dataset. Use when the user wants to benchmark on kyrgyz-sst2, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports F1-score (Weighted).
Scanned 9/11/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add qhjqhj00/research-skills-pool --skill kyrgyz-sst2-eval --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Kyrgyz Sst2 Eval?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/qhjqhj00-kyrgyz-sst2-eval)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: kyrgyz-sst2-eval
description: Evaluates sentiment classification capability on Kyrgyz language text. It measures how effectively a model can distinguish between positive and negative sentiments using a manually annotated benchmark dataset. Use when the user wants to benchmark on kyrgyz-sst2, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports F1-score (Weighted).
metadata:
skill_kind: dataset_eval
source_arxiv: 2511.20182
bibtex_key: metinov2025kyrgyzbert
confidence: high
---
# kyrgyz-sst2-eval
> KyrgyzBERT: A Compact, Efficient Language Model for Kyrgyz NLP — Metinov et al. (2025) (arXiv:2511.20182, 2025)
## What this evaluates
Evaluates sentiment classification capability on Kyrgyz language text. It measures how effectively a model can distinguish between positive and negative sentiments using a manually annotated benchmark dataset.
## Datasets
- **kyrgyz-sst2** — total ?; splits: test (-1)
## Metrics
- `F1-score (Weighted)` **(primary)** — range: [0, 1]
- Weighted F1-score, which computes the F1-score for each sentiment class and averages them weighted by the number of true instances for each class.
## Input / output format
**Input**: Kyrgyz language text sentences.
**Output**: Predicted sentiment label (positive or negative) per sentence.
## Scoring recipe
```python
def weighted_f1(preds, gold):
classes = sorted(set(preds) | set(gold))
f1s, weights = [], []
for c in classes:
tp = sum(p == c and g == c for p, g in zip(preds, gold))
fp = sum(p == c and g != c for p, g in zip(preds, gold))
fn = sum(p != c and g == c for p, g in zip(preds, gold))
prec = tp / (tp + fp) if (tp + fp) > 0 else 0
rec = tp / (tp + fn) if (tp + fn) > 0 else 0
f1 = 2 * prec * rec / (prec + rec) if (prec + rec) > 0 else 0
f1s.append(f1)
weights.append(sum(1 for g in gold if g == c))
return sum(f * w for f, w in zip(f1s, weights)) / sum(weights)
```
## Common pitfalls
- Zero-shot base models perform near random chance (~0.32 F1), so readers must not assume pre-trained multilingual models work out-of-the-box for Kyrgyz.
- The benchmark reports weighted F1, not accuracy; comparing against accuracy-based baselines or misinterpreting the metric will lead to incorrect conclusions about model performance.
## Evidence (verbatim from paper)
> The results clearly indicate that task-specific finetuning is essential, as the base models perform poorly, with F1-scores near the level of a random classifier (Table [II]). Our primary finding is that finetuned ‘KyrgyzBert‘ achieves a strong F1-score of 0.8280, confirming that a compact, monolingual model is highly effective for downstream tasks in Kyrgyz.
## Citation
```bibtex
@misc{metinov2025kyrgyzbert,
title={KyrgyzBERT: A Compact, Efficient Language Model for Kyrgyz NLP},
author={Metinov et al. (2025)},
year={2025},
note={arXiv:2511.20182}
}
```
- arXiv: 2511.20182
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!