Evaluates the quality of learned key-value (KV) cache eviction policies in preserving long-context reasoning and generation capabilities under strict memory constraints. It measures how well different compression strategies retain critical tokens without access to query-specific attention scores during the compression phase. Use when the user wants to benchmark on RULER-4k, OASST2-4k, BoolQ, ARC-Challenge, MMLU, HellaSwag, GovReport, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports accuracy.
Scanned 9/11/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add qhjqhj00/research-skills-pool --skill kv-cache-eviction-eval --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Kv Cache Eviction Eval?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/qhjqhj00-kv-cache-eviction-eval)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: kv-cache-eviction-eval
description: Evaluates the quality of learned key-value (KV) cache eviction policies in preserving long-context reasoning and generation capabilities under strict memory constraints. It measures how well different compression strategies retain critical tokens without access to query-specific attention scores during the compression phase. Use when the user wants to benchmark on RULER-4k, OASST2-4k, BoolQ, ARC-Challenge, MMLU, HellaSwag, GovReport, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports accuracy.
metadata:
skill_kind: dataset_eval
source_arxiv: 2602.10238
bibtex_key: moschella2026learning
confidence: high
---
# kv-cache-eviction-eval
> Learning to Evict from Key-Value Cache — Moschella et al. (2026) (arXiv:2602.10238, 2026)
## What this evaluates
Evaluates the quality of learned key-value (KV) cache eviction policies in preserving long-context reasoning and generation capabilities under strict memory constraints. It measures how well different compression strategies retain critical tokens without access to query-specific attention scores during the compression phase.
## Datasets
- **RULER-4k** — total ?; splits: test (-1)
- **OASST2-4k** — total ?; splits: test (-1)
- **BoolQ** — total ?; splits: test (-1)
- **ARC-Challenge** — total ?; splits: test (-1)
- **MMLU** — total ?; splits: test (-1)
- **HellaSwag** — total ?; splits: test (-1)
- **GovReport** — total ?; splits: test (-1)
## Metrics
- `accuracy` **(primary)** — range: [0, 1]
- Exact-match accuracy: the fraction of generated answers that exactly match the ground-truth answer for each benchmark instance.
- `perplexity (PPL)` — range: [0, inf)
- Perplexity measures next-token prediction capability: PPL = exp(-1/N * sum_{i=1}^N log p(x_i)), where p(x_i) is the model's predicted probability for token i.
- `ROUGE-L` — range: [0, 1]
- Longest common subsequence-based F1 score between the generated summary and the reference summary, measuring structural overlap.
- `negative per-budget reward (-R^b)` — range: other
- The negative sum of future importance scores of evicted tokens across all cache budgets, used as an ablation metric to quantify policy learning quality.
## Input / output format
**Input**: Key-value vectors and token positions for each token in the context. For attention-based baselines, attention scores are also provided during the prefill stage.
**Output**: A ranked permutation of tokens indicating eviction priority (for policy evaluation), or generated text answers/summaries for downstream benchmarks.
## Scoring recipe
```python
def compute_metrics(predictions, gold, metric_type):
if metric_type == 'accuracy':
return sum(1 for p, g in zip(predictions, gold) if p == g) / len(gold)
elif metric_type == 'perplexity':
return math.exp(-sum(math.log(p) for p in predictions) / len(predictions))
elif metric_type == 'rouge_l':
return rouge_l_score(predictions, gold)
elif metric_type == 'reward':
return -sum(evicted_token_importance for budget in budgets)
return None
```
## Common pitfalls
- Using relative compression ratios instead of absolute token budgets, which obscures fixed-memory constraints and makes cross-scenario comparison unstable.
- Comparing attention-free methods against baselines that use query-specific attention scores computed during the prefill stage, giving the latter an unfair informational advantage.
- Including the final question in the prefill stage for BoolQ and GovReport, which violates the zero-shot generalization setup where the text is compressed before the question is known.
## Evidence (verbatim from paper)
> We evaluate performance on the RULER benchmark using its official text-based accuracy metric, which requires generating the correct answer for long-context reasoning tasks. We evaluate the efficacy of KV cache compression by its impact on perplexity (PPL), a measure of the model’s next-token prediction capability. We report performance as a function of absolute KV cache size (i.e., the number of tokens retained) rather than a relative compression ratio.
## Citation
```bibtex
@misc{moschella2026learning,
title={Learning to Evict from Key-Value Cache},
author={Moschella et al. (2026)},
year={2026},
note={arXiv:2602.10238}
}
```
- arXiv: 2602.10238
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!