Skip to content
Back to skills

Kitti Subt Vo Depth Eval

ASecurity

Evaluates unsupervised monocular visual odometry and depth estimation methods on challenging driving and subterranean environments. Probes the model's ability to predict consistent 6-DoF ego-motion and recover accurate depth maps without ground-truth supervision. Use when the user wants to benchmark on KITTI, DARPA Subterranean Challenge, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports relative translation error ($t_{err}$), relative rotation error ($r_{err}$).

  • 3 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 1 view
  • Added September 11, 2026
researchpythongo

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned September 11, 2026

npx -y skills add qhjqhj00/research-skills-pool --skill kitti-subt-vo-depth-eval --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Kitti Subt Vo Depth Eval?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Kitti Subt Vo Depth Eval
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/qhjqhj00-kitti-subt-vo-depth-eval/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/qhjqhj00-kitti-subt-vo-depth-eval)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: kitti-subt-vo-depth-eval
description: Evaluates unsupervised monocular visual odometry and depth estimation methods on challenging driving and subterranean environments. Probes the model's ability to predict consistent 6-DoF ego-motion and recover accurate depth maps without ground-truth supervision. Use when the user wants to benchmark on KITTI, DARPA Subterranean Challenge, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports relative translation error ($t_{err}$), relative rotation error ($r_{err}$).
metadata:
  skill_kind: dataset_eval
  source_arxiv: 2011.00341
  bibtex_key: [REDACTED]
  confidence: high
---

# kitti-subt-vo-depth-eval

> Unsupervised Deep Persistent Monocular Visual Odometry and Depth Estimation in Extreme Environments — Almalioglu et al. (2020) (arXiv:2011.00341, 2020)

## What this evaluates

Evaluates unsupervised monocular visual odometry and depth estimation methods on challenging driving and subterranean environments. Probes the model's ability to predict consistent 6-DoF ego-motion and recover accurate depth maps without ground-truth supervision.

## Datasets

- **KITTI** — total ?; splits: test (-1)
- **DARPA Subterranean Challenge** — total ?; splits: test (-1)

## Metrics

- `relative translation error ($t_{err}$)` **(primary)** — range: percent
  - Relative translation error divided by distance travelled, averaged over trajectory segments of lengths {7, 14, 21, 28, 35} m. Predictions are aligned to ground truth via 7-DoF optimization minimizing ATE.
- `relative rotation error ($r_{err}$)` **(primary)** — range: percent
  - Relative rotation error divided by distance travelled, averaged over trajectory segments of lengths {7, 14, 21, 28, 35} m. Predictions are aligned to ground truth via 7-DoF optimization minimizing ATE.
- `AbsRel` — range: other
  - Mean absolute relative difference between predicted and ground truth depth: mean(|pred - gt| / gt).
- `SqRel` — range: other
  - Mean squared relative difference: mean((pred - gt)^2 / gt).
- `RMS` — range: other
  - Root mean square error between predicted and ground truth depth.
- `RMSlog` — range: other
  - Root mean square error between log-predicted and log-ground truth depth.
- `δ<1.25` — range: percent
  - Percentage of pixels where max(pred/gt, gt/pred) < 1.25.
- `δ<1.25²` — range: percent
  - Percentage of pixels where max(pred/gt, gt/pred) < 1.25².
- `δ<1.25³` — range: percent
  - Percentage of pixels where max(pred/gt, gt/pred) < 1.25³.

## Input / output format

**Input**: Sequential RGB images resized to 416×256 pixels.

**Output**: Per-frame 6-DoF ego-motion (translation and rotation) and a monocular depth map.

## Scoring recipe

```python
# Pose evaluation
t_errs, r_errs = [], []
for seg_len in [7, 14, 21, 28, 35]:
    for seg in trajectory_segments(length=seg_len):
        aligned_pred = align_7dof(seg.predicted_poses, seg.gt_poses)
        rel_err = compute_relative_error(aligned_pred, seg.gt_poses)
        t_errs.append(rel_err.t_err)
        r_errs.append(rel_err.r_err)
t_err = mean(t_errs)
r_err = mean(r_errs)

# Depth evaluation (Eigen split)
absrel = mean(abs(pred_depth - gt_depth) / gt_depth)
sqrel = mean((pred_depth - gt_depth)**2 / gt_depth)
rms = sqrt(mean((pred_depth - gt_depth)**2))
rmslog = sqrt(mean((log(pred_depth) - log(gt_depth))**2))
acc1 = mean((pred_depth / gt_depth < 1.25) & (gt_depth / pred_depth < 1.25))
acc2 = mean((pred_depth / gt_depth < 1.25**2) & (gt_depth / pred_depth < 1.25**2))
acc3 = mean((pred_depth / gt_depth < 1.25**3) & (gt_depth / pred_depth < 1.25**3))
```

## Common pitfalls

- Monocular pose predictions must be aligned to ground truth via 7-DoF optimization (minimizing ATE) before computing relative errors, as they lack real-world scale.
- Depth metrics are computed on the Eigen et al. crop/split of KITTI, not full-resolution images, which drastically changes absolute metric values.
- Relative pose errors are averaged across multiple segment lengths (7–35 m), not reported for a single fixed distance.

## Evidence (verbatim from paper)

> Thus, we show statistics for the relative translation and rotation error, divided by the distance travelled and averaged over the trajectory segments of lengths ${7,14,21,28,35}$ m over all sequences based on the shortest sequence. Here, the depth is evaluated on the Eigen et al. split of the raw KITTI dataset following the previous works.

## Citation

```bibtex
@misc{almalioglu2020unsupervised,
  title={Unsupervised Deep Persistent Monocular Visual Odometry and Depth Estimation in Extreme Environments},
  author={Almalioglu et al. (2020)},
  year={2020},
  note={arXiv:2011.00341}
}
```

- arXiv: 2011.00341

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.