Evaluates the visual fidelity and text-image alignment of generated images. It measures realism and distribution matching using FID, and semantic alignment using CLIP scores. Use when the user wants to benchmark on COCO-2014, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports FID (CLIP features).
Scanned 9/11/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add qhjqhj00/research-skills-pool --skill image-synthesis-eval --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Image Synthesis Eval?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/qhjqhj00-image-synthesis-eval)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: image-synthesis-eval
description: Evaluates the visual fidelity and text-image alignment of generated images. It measures realism and distribution matching using FID, and semantic alignment using CLIP scores. Use when the user wants to benchmark on COCO-2014, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports FID (CLIP features).
metadata:
skill_kind: dataset_eval
source_arxiv: 2403.03206
bibtex_key: esser2024scalingrectifiedflow
confidence: high
---
# image-synthesis-eval
> Scaling Rectified Flow Transformers for High-Resolution Image Synthesis — Esser et al. (2024) (arXiv:2403.03206, 2024)
## What this evaluates
Evaluates the visual fidelity and text-image alignment of generated images. It measures realism and distribution matching using FID, and semantic alignment using CLIP scores.
## Datasets
- **COCO-2014** — total ?; splits: val (-1)
## Metrics
- `FID (CLIP features)` **(primary)** — range: [0, ∞) (lower is better)
- Fréchet Inception Distance computed on CLIP image features to measure the distance between real and generated image distributions. Lower values indicate better quality.
- `CLIP score` — range: [0, 1] (higher is better)
- Cosine similarity between CLIP image and text embeddings. Higher values indicate better text-image alignment.
## Input / output format
**Input**: Text prompt (for generation) and real images (for FID calculation).
**Output**: Generated RGB image.
## Scoring recipe
```python
def compute_metrics(gen_images, real_images, prompts):
clip_gen = clip_model.encode(gen_images)
clip_real = clip_model.encode(real_images)
fid = frechet_distance(clip_gen, clip_real)
clip_scores = cosine_similarity(clip_gen, clip_model.encode(prompts))
return fid, clip_scores.mean()
```
## Common pitfalls
- FID is calculated on CLIP features, not the standard Inception v3 features.
- Lower FID is better, while higher CLIP score is better.
- Evaluation is strictly performed on the COCO-2014 validation split, not the training data.
## Evidence (verbatim from paper)
> We calculate the FID on CLIP features as proposed by (Sauer et al., 2021). All metrics are evaluated on the COCO-2014 validation split (Lin et al., 2014).
## Citation
```bibtex
@misc{esser2024scalingrectifiedflow,
title={Scaling Rectified Flow Transformers for High-Resolution Image Synthesis},
author={Esser et al. (2024)},
year={2024},
note={arXiv:2403.03206}
}
```
- arXiv: 2403.03206
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!