Skip to content
Back to skills

Graphfusionsbr Eval

ASecurity

Evaluates session-based recommendation systems by predicting the next item in a user's interaction sequence. It probes the model's ability to capture high-order item relationships and leverage external knowledge graphs for accurate, context-aware ranking. Use when the user wants to benchmark on Tmall, RetailRocket, KKBox, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports P@10.

  • 3 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 3 views
  • Added September 11, 2026
researchpythongoperformance

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned September 11, 2026

npx -y skills add qhjqhj00/research-skills-pool --skill graphfusionsbr-eval --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Graphfusionsbr Eval?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Graphfusionsbr Eval
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/qhjqhj00-graphfusionsbr-eval/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/qhjqhj00-graphfusionsbr-eval)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: graphfusionsbr-eval
description: Evaluates session-based recommendation systems by predicting the next item in a user's interaction sequence. It probes the model's ability to capture high-order item relationships and leverage external knowledge graphs for accurate, context-aware ranking. Use when the user wants to benchmark on Tmall, RetailRocket, KKBox, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports P@10.
metadata:
  skill_kind: dataset_eval
  source_arxiv: 2601.08497
  bibtex_key: [REDACTED]
  confidence: high
---

# graphfusionsbr-eval

> GraphFusionSBR: Denoising Multi-Channel Graphs for Session-Based Recommendation — He et al. (2026) (arXiv:2601.08497, 2026)

## What this evaluates

Evaluates session-based recommendation systems by predicting the next item in a user's interaction sequence. It probes the model's ability to capture high-order item relationships and leverage external knowledge graphs for accurate, context-aware ranking.

## Datasets

- **Tmall** — total 374178; splits: train (348766), test (25412)
- **RetailRocket** — total 392010; splits: train (388541), test (3469)
- **KKBox** — total 514513; splits: train (432689), test (81824)

## Metrics

- `P@10` **(primary)** — range: percent
  - Precision@10 measures the proportion of correctly recommended items within the top 10 predictions. Calculated as the average of binary indicators over all test sessions.
- `MRR@10` — range: percent
  - Mean Reciprocal Rank@10 assesses ranking quality by taking the reciprocal of the rank of the first correct item in the top 10 list. Averaged over all test sessions.

## Input / output format

**Input**: A session prefix sequence of item IDs [i_1, ..., i_{m-1}] and associated knowledge graph attributes (e.g., category, seller, genre).

**Output**: A ranked list of candidate item IDs (top K).

## Scoring recipe

```python
def compute_metrics(preds, gold, K):
    p_at_k = 0.0
    mrr_at_k = 0.0
    for p, g in zip(preds, gold):
        if g in p[:K]:
            p_at_k += 1.0
            rank = p.index(g) + 1
            mrr_at_k += 1.0 / rank
    return p_at_k / len(gold) * 100, mrr_at_k / len(gold) * 100
```

## Common pitfalls

- Data augmentation via sequence splitting significantly inflates training set size (e.g., Tmall goes from 120k sessions to 348k sequences); failing to replicate this step will yield mismatched training scales.
- Dataset-specific filtering rules vary (e.g., RetailRocket retains sessions of length 2-4 and >4; KKBox filters tracks <1 min and enforces max order difference of 3); applying a uniform filter will corrupt the data distribution.
- Metrics are reported as percentages in tables but calculated as proportions; ensure consistent scaling when comparing results.

## Evidence (verbatim from paper)

> To evaluate the performance of our model, we employ two widely used metrics: Precision@$K$ (P@$K$) and Mean Reciprocal Rank@$K$ (MRR@$K$), with $K$ values set to 10 and 20. These metrics enable a robust assessment of both recommendation accuracy and ranking quality, which are essential for session-based recommendation systems. Specifically, P@$K$ measures the proportion of correctly recommended items within the top $K$ predictions.

## Citation

```bibtex
@misc{he2026graphfusionsbr,
  title={GraphFusionSBR: Denoising Multi-Channel Graphs for Session-Based Recommendation},
  author={He et al. (2026)},
  year={2026},
  note={arXiv:2601.08497}
}
```

- arXiv: 2601.08497

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.