Evaluates text-to-speech synthesis quality, inference efficiency, and probabilistic modeling accuracy of a diffusion-based model. It probes the trade-off between synthesis fidelity and computational cost by varying reverse diffusion steps, and measures human-perceived audio quality against strong baselines. Use when the user wants to benchmark on LJSpeech, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports MOS.
Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Grad Tts Eval?
Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/qhjqhj00-grad-tts-eval)
---
name: grad-tts-eval
description: Evaluates text-to-speech synthesis quality, inference efficiency, and probabilistic modeling accuracy of a diffusion-based model. It probes the trade-off between synthesis fidelity and computational cost by varying reverse diffusion steps, and measures human-perceived audio quality against strong baselines. Use when the user wants to benchmark on LJSpeech, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports MOS.
metadata:
skill_kind: dataset_eval
source_arxiv: 2105.06337
bibtex_key: [REDACTED]
confidence: high
---
# grad-tts-eval
> Grad-TTS: A Diffusion Probabilistic Model for Text-to-Speech — Popov et al. (2021) (arXiv:2105.06337, 2021)
## What this evaluates
Evaluates text-to-speech synthesis quality, inference efficiency, and probabilistic modeling accuracy of a diffusion-based model. It probes the trade-off between synthesis fidelity and computational cost by varying reverse diffusion steps, and measures human-perceived audio quality against strong baselines.
## Datasets
- **LJSpeech** — total ?; splits: train (-1), test (500)
## Metrics
- `MOS` **(primary)** — range: [1, 5]
- Average of 10 human ratings per audio sample on a 9-point Likert scale (1.0 to 5.0 in 0.5 increments).
- `Log-likelihood` — range: other
- Average data log-likelihood estimated over 50 test sentences using the instantaneous change of variables formula and Hutchinson’s trace estimator.
- `RTF` — range: other
- Real-Time Factor: ratio of total inference time to total generated audio duration.
## Input / output format
**Input**: Phonemized text sequence
**Output**: Synthesized audio waveform
## Scoring recipe
```python
def compute_mos(predictions, gold):
ratings = [human_listen_test(audio) for audio in predictions]
return mean(ratings)
def compute_rtf(predictions, gold):
total_time = sum(inference_time(audio) for audio in predictions)
total_dur = sum(audio_duration(audio) for audio in predictions)
return total_time / total_dur
def compute_log_likelihood(predictions, gold):
lls = [compute_log_likelihood_score(text) for text in gold[:50]]
return mean(lls)
```
## Common pitfalls
- Diffusion loss convergence does not guarantee high synthesis quality; inaccurate gradient predictions for a small subset of time steps can severely degrade output despite low loss.
- Baseline comparisons may be skewed if unofficial implementations are used (e.g., FastSpeech in this work).
- Inference speed vs. quality trade-off is highly sensitive to the number of reverse diffusion steps; N=10 achieves near-optimal MOS, making higher N values computationally wasteful.
## Evidence (verbatim from paper)
> For Mean Opinion Score (MOS) estimation we synthesized 40 sentences from the test set with each model. The assessors were asked to estimate the quality of synthesized speech on a nine-point Likert scale, the lowest and the highest scores being 1 point (“Bad”) and 5 points (“Excellent”) with a step of 0.5 point. To ensure the reliability of the obtained results, only Master assessors were assigned to complete the listening test. Each audio was evaluated by 10 assessors.
## Citation
```bibtex
@misc{popov2021gradtts,
title={Grad-TTS: A Diffusion Probabilistic Model for Text-to-Speech},
author={Popov et al. (2021)},
year={2021},
note={arXiv:2105.06337}
}
```
- arXiv: 2105.06337