Evaluates automatic speech recognition (ASR) models on low-resource languages (Thai, Indonesian, Vietnamese) to measure transcription accuracy against reference texts. It probes the model's ability to handle domain-shifted audio and varying linguistic structures using character-level or word-level error metrics. Use when the user wants to benchmark on GigaSpeech 2, Common Voice 17.0, FLEURS, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports CER/WER.
Scanned 9/11/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add qhjqhj00/research-skills-pool --skill gigaspeech2-asr-eval --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Gigaspeech2 Asr Eval?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/qhjqhj00-gigaspeech2-asr-eval)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: gigaspeech2-asr-eval
description: Evaluates automatic speech recognition (ASR) models on low-resource languages (Thai, Indonesian, Vietnamese) to measure transcription accuracy against reference texts. It probes the model's ability to handle domain-shifted audio and varying linguistic structures using character-level or word-level error metrics. Use when the user wants to benchmark on GigaSpeech 2, Common Voice 17.0, FLEURS, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports CER/WER.
metadata:
skill_kind: dataset_eval
source_arxiv: 2406.11546
bibtex_key: yang2024gigaspeech2
confidence: high
---
# gigaspeech2-asr-eval
> GigaSpeech 2: An Evolving, Large-Scale and Multi-domain ASR Corpus for Low-Resource Languages with Automated Crawling, Transcription and Refinement — Yang et al. (2024) (arXiv:2406.11546, 2024)
## What this evaluates
Evaluates automatic speech recognition (ASR) models on low-resource languages (Thai, Indonesian, Vietnamese) to measure transcription accuracy against reference texts. It probes the model's ability to handle domain-shifted audio and varying linguistic structures using character-level or word-level error metrics.
## Datasets
- **GigaSpeech 2** — total ?; splits: DEV (-1), TEST (-1)
- **Common Voice 17.0** — total ?; splits: TEST (-1)
- **FLEURS** — total ?; splits: TEST (-1)
## Metrics
- `CER/WER` **(primary)** — range: percent
- Standard Levenshtein edit distance normalized by the reference length. Character-level edits are counted for Thai (CER); word-level edits are counted for Indonesian and Vietnamese (WER).
## Input / output format
**Input**: Raw audio recordings of speech in Thai, Indonesian, or Vietnamese.
**Output**: Transcribed text string corresponding to the input audio.
## Scoring recipe
```python
def compute_cer_wer(predictions, references, word_level=False):
total_errors = 0
total_ref_len = 0
for p, r in zip(predictions, references):
tokens_p = p.split() if word_level else list(p)
tokens_r = r.split() if word_level else list(r)
total_errors += levenshtein_distance(tokens_p, tokens_r)
total_ref_len += len(tokens_r)
return (total_errors / total_ref_len) * 100
```
## Common pitfalls
- CER is used for Thai while WER is used for Indonesian and Vietnamese; mixing these up will invalidate cross-lingual comparisons.
- Performance drops on Common Voice and FLEURS are attributed to domain mismatch rather than model failure, so cross-dataset comparisons should account for audio distribution shifts.
- Comparing models with vastly different parameter counts (e.g., 151.9M vs 1.5B) without noting compute/size differences can be misleading.
## Evidence (verbatim from paper)
> The ASR performance is evaluated regarding character error rate (CER) or word error rate (WER) on three distinct test sets from GigaSpeech 2, Common Voice 17.0, and FLEURS.
## Citation
```bibtex
@misc{yang2024gigaspeech2,
title={GigaSpeech 2: An Evolving, Large-Scale and Multi-domain ASR Corpus for Low-Resource Languages with Automated Crawling, Transcription and Refinement},
author={Yang et al. (2024)},
year={2024},
note={arXiv:2406.11546}
}
```
- arXiv: 2406.11546
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!