Skip to content
Back to skills

Free Geometry Eval

ASecurity

Evaluates test-time self-supervised adaptation for feed-forward 3D reconstruction models. It probes the model's ability to refine camera pose estimation and 3D geometry reconstruction on unseen scenes by enforcing cross-view feature consistency without ground-truth labels. Use when the user wants to benchmark on ETH3D, ScanNet++, 7-Scenes, HiROOM, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports AUC@3, F1-score.

  • 3 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 2 views
  • Added September 11, 2026
researchpythonperformance

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned September 11, 2026

npx -y skills add qhjqhj00/research-skills-pool --skill free-geometry-eval --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Free Geometry Eval?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Free Geometry Eval
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/qhjqhj00-free-geometry-eval/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/qhjqhj00-free-geometry-eval)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: free-geometry-eval
description: Evaluates test-time self-supervised adaptation for feed-forward 3D reconstruction models. It probes the model's ability to refine camera pose estimation and 3D geometry reconstruction on unseen scenes by enforcing cross-view feature consistency without ground-truth labels. Use when the user wants to benchmark on ETH3D, ScanNet++, 7-Scenes, HiROOM, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports AUC@3, F1-score.
metadata:
  skill_kind: dataset_eval
  source_arxiv: 2604.14048
  bibtex_key: [REDACTED]
  confidence: high
---

# free-geometry-eval

> Free Geometry: Refining 3D Reconstruction from Longer Versions of Itself — Dai et al. (2026) (arXiv:2604.14048, 2026)

## What this evaluates

Evaluates test-time self-supervised adaptation for feed-forward 3D reconstruction models. It probes the model's ability to refine camera pose estimation and 3D geometry reconstruction on unseen scenes by enforcing cross-view feature consistency without ground-truth labels.

## Datasets

- **ETH3D** — total ?; splits: test (-1)
- **ScanNet++** — total ?; splits: test (-1)
- **7-Scenes** — total ?; splits: test (-1)
- **HiROOM** — total ?; splits: test (-1)

## Metrics

- `AUC@3` **(primary)** — range: [0, 1]
  - Area under the cumulative error curve for rotation (degrees) and translation (cm) errors, computed up to a 3-degree/3-cm threshold. Higher is better.
- `F1-score` **(primary)** — range: [0, 1]
  - F-score computed at standard distance thresholds between the predicted point cloud (aligned to ground truth via evo) and the ground truth point cloud. Higher is better.

## Input / output format

**Input**: N randomly sampled RGB views (typically 4, 8, 16, or 32) from a test scene sequence.

**Output**: Predicted camera poses and depth maps for each view; a reconstructed point cloud aligned to ground truth.

## Scoring recipe

```python
def compute_auc3(errors_deg, errors_cm, threshold=3.0):
    cum_errors = np.sort(np.concatenate([errors_deg, errors_cm]))
    auc = np.trapz(np.arange(len(cum_errors)+1)/len(cum_errors), cum_errors)
    return min(auc / threshold, 1.0)

def compute_f1(pred_cloud, gt_cloud):
    aligned = evo.align(pred_cloud, gt_cloud)
    dists = cdist(aligned, gt_cloud)
    tp = np.sum(dists.min(axis=1) < threshold)
    fp = len(aligned) - tp
    fn = len(gt_cloud) - tp
    return 2*tp / (2*tp + fp + fn)

# Average over 3 fixed seeds (43, 44, 45) per scene
```

## Common pitfalls

- View sampling is random but fixed to 3 seeds (43, 44, 45) per scene; results are averaged over these seeds, not per-scene then averaged, which can bias variance.
- Point cloud alignment to ground truth using evo is mandatory before F1 computation; skipping alignment invalidates the metric.
- Test-time optimization uses only 5 epochs with dataset-specific learning rates, making direct comparison with standard zero-shot baselines sensitive to adaptation budget.

## Evidence (verbatim from paper)

> We report AUC at multiple thresholds (AUC@3, AUC@30) measuring the area under the cumulative error curve for rotation and translation errors. ... The resulting point cloud is aligned with ground truth by applying evo to assess the F-score at standard distance thresholds. Higher values indicate better performance for all metrics. All results are averaged over 3 random seeds.

## Citation

```bibtex
@misc{dai2026freegeometry,
  title={Free Geometry: Refining 3D Reconstruction from Longer Versions of Itself},
  author={Dai et al. (2026)},
  year={2026},
  note={arXiv:2604.14048}
}
```

- arXiv: 2604.14048

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.