Evaluates music information retrieval models on genre classification tasks using a large-scale, open music dataset. It probes the model's ability to map audio tracks to hierarchical genre labels (single-label or multi-label) using raw audio or precomputed features. Use when the user wants to benchmark on FMA (Free Music Archive), or asks about evaluating this task. Reports accuracy.
Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Fma Genre Classification Eval?
Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/qhjqhj00-fma-genre-classification-eval)
---
name: fma-genre-classification-eval
description: Evaluates music information retrieval models on genre classification tasks using a large-scale, open music dataset. It probes the model's ability to map audio tracks to hierarchical genre labels (single-label or multi-label) using raw audio or precomputed features. Use when the user wants to benchmark on FMA (Free Music Archive), or asks about evaluating this task. Reports accuracy.
metadata:
skill_kind: dataset_eval
source_arxiv: 1612.01840
bibtex_key: [REDACTED]
confidence: high
---
# fma-genre-classification-eval
> FMA: A Dataset For Music Analysis — Defferrard et al. (2016) (arXiv:1612.01840, 2016)
## What this evaluates
Evaluates music information retrieval models on genre classification tasks using a large-scale, open music dataset. It probes the model's ability to map audio tracks to hierarchical genre labels (single-label or multi-label) using raw audio or precomputed features.
## Datasets
- **FMA (Free Music Archive)** — total 106574; splits: train (-1), val (-1), test (-1); repo https://github.com/mdeff/fma
## Metrics
- `accuracy` **(primary)** — range: [0, 1]
- Standard classification accuracy: the proportion of correctly predicted genre labels out of the total number of test instances.
## Input / output format
**Input**: 30-second MP3 audio clips (for Large/Medium/Small subsets) or full-length MP3s (for Full subset), optionally accompanied by precomputed librosa features (518 features) and metadata.
**Output**: A predicted genre label (or set of labels) from the 161-category hierarchical taxonomy.
## Scoring recipe
```python
def calculate_accuracy(predictions, gold_labels):
correct = sum(1 for p, g in zip(predictions, gold_labels) if p == g)
return correct / len(gold_labels)
```
## Common pitfalls
- Artist leakage: using tracks from the same artist in both train and test sets inflates accuracy.
- Genre hierarchy ambiguity: tracks can have multiple sub-genres; models must decide whether to predict top-level, specific, or all ancestor genres.
- Metadata noise: artist-provided genres may be inconsistent or motivated by play counts rather than objective classification.
## Evidence (verbatim from paper)
> It has been shown that the use of songs from the same artist in both training and test sets leads to over-optimistic accuracy and may favor some approaches
## Citation
```bibtex
@misc{defferrard2016fma,
title={FMA: A Dataset For Music Analysis},
author={Defferrard et al. (2016)},
year={2016},
note={arXiv:1612.01840}
}
```
- arXiv: 1612.01840